api: add openStackServiceIdentity to Nova service and template specs#1099
api: add openStackServiceIdentity to Nova service and template specs#1099amartyasinha wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
|
Skipping CI for Draft Pull Request. |
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: amartyasinha The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Add optional OpenStackServiceIdentity (openstackService, serviceComponent) on NovaServiceBase and Nova/NovaCell *Template types for logical service/component identity. Signed-off-by: Amartya Sinha <amsinha@redhat.com>
126c653 to
fa5cf27
Compare
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/388a87e6269f4cb8b52e489bdddd9f64 ✔️ openstack-meta-content-provider SUCCESS in 4h 00m 26s |
|
recheck nova-operator-tempest-multinode |
|
Build failed (check pipeline). Post https://softwarefactory-project.io/zuul/t/rdoproject.org/buildset/a4a5fbbad68046babab46e48e54abc3b ✔️ openstack-meta-content-provider SUCCESS in 2h 49m 09s |
gibizer
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I don't see the reason to make this API change.
@gibizer In the initial draft, I did not make this API change. To get Once the lib-common gets the ability to handle multi-segment path, then we can go with https://github.com/openstack-k8s-operators/nova-operator/pull/1096/changes. If we decide to proceed with adding these new fields in the specs, then the order would be:
If we decide not to add new fields in the specs, then the order would be:
|
|
Closing as we do not want to modify the specs. |
Add optional OpenStackServiceIdentity (openstackService, serviceComponent) on NovaServiceBase and Nova/NovaCell *Template types for logical service/component identity.