Skip to content

Remove compound name parsing, store members in data#242

Draft
bkeepers wants to merge 6 commits intocompound-name-parsing-fixesfrom
rework-constituent-definitions
Draft

Remove compound name parsing, store members in data#242
bkeepers wants to merge 6 commits intocompound-name-parsing-fixesfrom
rework-constituent-definitions

Conversation

@bkeepers
Copy link
Contributor

I'm about 4 cans of worms deep into changing how neaps stores and interprets constituent definitions. This is a followup to #240 to explore changing the constituent definitions in data.json to store raw Doodson coefficients directly, with an optional human-readable XDO string for cross-referencing, and pre-compute all compound member decompositions. It removes the nodalCorrection letter code entirely, replacing it with explicit members in the data. This eliminates the need for the Annex B name parser and the resolveMembers() function at runtime.

I'm just going to open this and let it sit for a while and think about it. This current implementation is also blocked by #241. It could be unblocked by rebasing on master and switching the implementation of coefficient parsing back to the Schureman convention.

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.

📢 Thoughts on this report? Let us know!

@bkeepers bkeepers force-pushed the compound-name-parsing-fixes branch from 8518a94 to 5b6636f Compare March 8, 2026 19:55
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant