test: explicitly release stale claim lock - #180
Draft
tomatotomata wants to merge 1 commit into
Draft
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
Closes #179
Validation
cargo fmt --all --checkpassedgit diff --checkpassedThe focused
cargo test --lockedcommand could not compile this Windows checkout because the repository currently imports Unix-only APIs (std::os::unix,tokio::signal::unix) in the default test build. The patch uses the same explicitlock._file.unlock()pattern already present inlock_and_ledger_prevent_overlap_and_recover_stale_claim.AI-assisted contribution. I reviewed the test path and existing lock-release precedent manually.