Fix json resp

[lichray]

No description provided.

[painterjd]

I am generally not a fan of moving so many classes into one python file (resources.py). What's the advantage to doing it this way? Sure, all of those things are 'resources' (if you want to look at it like that) but why should they be grouped into a single file?

[lichray]

1. queue.Queue, message.Message, claim.Claim... Eye bleeding.
2. Module should group things belonging to the same concept.

[painterjd]

Why namespace those objects then? Are we to confuse marconiclient.Queue with some other Queue class?

[lichray]

On Tue, Apr 16, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Jamie Painter notifications@github.comwrote:

Why namespace those objects then? Are we to confuse marconiclient.Queue
with some other Queue class?

I'm not talking about removing the namespace. The namespace is used to
group
similar things. For example, in the standard library, we have Queue.Queue,
Queue.LifoQueue,
similarly, for the client, we can have resource.Queue, resource.Message.
When talking
about avoiding name clashes, giving multiple classes one namespace is
equivalent functional
to giving each class a namespace. Neither approach brings confusion.

Zhihao Yuan, ID lichray
The best way to predict the future is to invent it.

---

4BSD -- http://4bsd.biz/