Skip to content

Add rule to exclude accessibility UX recommendations from code reviews #10

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
Copilot wants to merge 2 commits into
base: feat/user-auth-ui-improvements-review
Choose a base branch
from
Draft

Add rule to exclude accessibility UX recommendations from code reviews #10

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
84830d1
Initial plan
Copilot Dec 11, 2025
4f0a022
Add rule to exclude accessibility UX recommendations
Copilot Dec 11, 2025
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
16 changes: 16 additions & 0 deletions bugbot.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -55,3 +55,19 @@ This pattern should NOT be flagged as requiring the challenge to be cleared only
- Consistent naming conventions (camelCase for variables/functions, PascalCase for classes)

**Rationale**: Maintaining consistent code style in JavaScript files improves readability, reduces cognitive load during code reviews, and helps prevent subtle bugs. The `src/` folder contains the core application logic and should adhere to professional coding standards.

## UX and Accessibility Recommendations

### Assistive Technology and Accessibility Improvements

**DO NOT** recommend changes to improve UX for users relying on assistive technologies in this repository.

**Examples of recommendations to avoid**:
- Adding ARIA attributes (role, aria-live, aria-label, etc.)
- Adding screen reader-only text (sr-only classes)
- Keyboard navigation improvements
- Focus management suggestions
- Color contrast or visual accessibility enhancements
- Alternative text for images when not already present

**Rationale**: Accessibility improvements are not a priority for this codebase at this time. While important in general, the team has decided to defer these types of UX enhancements to focus on other development priorities.