sync-diff-inspector: use limit iterator to replace random iterator for TiDB source#12518
sync-diff-inspector: use limit iterator to replace random iterator for TiDB source#12518joechenrh wants to merge 12 commits intopingcap:masterfrom
Conversation
1. Extract common logic of index selection from each iterator 2. Make index-fields order‑sensitive 3. Minor changes to limit iterator, and choose it when there are available indexes. Signed-off-by: Ruihao Chen <joechenrh@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Ruihao Chen <joechenrh@gmail.com>
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. DetailsNeeds approval from an approver in each of these files:Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Summary of ChangesHello @joechenrh, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request significantly enhances the chunk splitting mechanism for TiDB sources within Highlights
🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console. Changelog
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Code Review
This pull request introduces a new LimitIterator for TiDB sources and refactors the splitter selection logic, aiming for significant improvements in performance and memory usage. A security audit identified two SQL injection vulnerabilities: a high-severity issue where optimizer hints are constructed without sanitizing for the comment terminator */, allowing SQL injection via malicious database object names, and a medium-severity issue where the collation setting from the configuration file is used in SQL queries without proper escaping. Additionally, issues were found in the new LimitIterator implementation related to handling table.Range, which could lead to incorrect behavior when a range filter is used.
| where, args := tagChunk.ToString(lmt.table.Collation) | ||
| query := fmt.Sprintf(lmt.queryTmpl, where) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The query for fetching chunk boundaries does not incorporate table.Range. This is a correctness issue as it can lead to splitting chunks based on data outside the specified range, potentially causing the diff to check incorrect data. The table.Range must be included in the WHERE clause of the boundary query.
where, args := tagChunk.ToString(lmt.table.Collation)
if !utils.IsRangeTrivial(lmt.table.Range) {
where = fmt.Sprintf("(%s) AND (%s)", where, lmt.table.Range)
}
query := fmt.Sprintf(lmt.queryTmpl, where)Signed-off-by: Ruihao Chen <joechenrh@gmail.com>
|
@joechenrh: The following tests failed, say
Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. DetailsInstructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here. |
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: close #12492
What is changed and how it works?
Change to use limit iterator(which is not used previously) instead of random iterator for TiDB source, which can:
This PR also make below refactors:
Check List
Tests
Questions
Will it cause performance regression or break compatibility?
Do you need to update user documentation, design documentation or monitoring documentation?
Release note