Add NADA implementation

[kevmo314]

This change adds the NADA congestion control implementation.
The binding to cc is left TODO.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #117 (48779ed) into master (09051cd) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is 79.16%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #117      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   79.30%   79.29%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files          51       56       +5     
  Lines        2460     2748     +288     
==========================================
+ Hits         1951     2179     +228     
- Misses        419      470      +51     
- Partials       90       99       +9     

Flag	Coverage Δ
go	79.29% <79.16%> (-0.02%)	⬇️
wasm	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
interceptor.go	100.00% <ø> (ø)
pkg/nack/retainable_packet.go	86.76% <ø> (ø)
pkg/nada/report.go	0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
pkg/nada/packet_stream.go	65.75% <65.75%> (ø)
pkg/nada/receiver.go	93.67% <93.67%> (ø)
pkg/nada/sender.go	93.75% <93.75%> (ø)
pkg/nada/config.go	100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 09051cd...48779ed. Read the comment docs.

[mengelbart]

@kevmo314 This is great, thanks for implementing it! Sorry I didn't get to review/test this earlier! I started #149 now to integrate it into interceptors and will try to find some time to review the code and understand NADA better.

[Krage56]

@kevmo314 This is great, thanks for implementing it! Sorry I didn't get to review/test this earlier! I started #149 now to integrate it into interceptors and will try to find some time to review the code and understand NADA better.

Hi! Is there some problems with implementation? Feature looks so good but hasn't been pushed in master yet :(

[kevmo314]

I’ve used the code before in production. Actually it works quite well and can often be more stable for higher bitrate use cases. I didn’t have the time to get it working with the interceptor library back then, a contribution would be welcome!

…

On Tue, Sep 16, 2025 at 5:47 AM Krage56 ***@***.***> wrote: *Krage56* left a comment (pion/interceptor#117) <#117 (comment)> @kevmo314 <https://github.com/kevmo314> This is great, thanks for implementing it! Sorry I didn't get to review/test this earlier! I started #149 <#149> now to integrate it into interceptors and will try to find some time to review the code and understand NADA better. Hi! Is there some problems with implementation? Feature looks so good but hasn't been pushed in master yet :( — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#117 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAD423RP45KUDGFD3OYBFP33S7MDVAVCNFSM6AAAAACGUGLQE6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMZTEOJXGIYDENJZGQ> . You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID: ***@***.***>