Skip to content

pmborg/ApolloXM

Repository files navigation

[2] ApolloXM (Earth → Mars → Earth)

There are 2 ApolloX programs addressed in my REPOS:

  • [1] ApolloX (Earth → Moon → Earth)**

  • [2] ApolloXM (Earth → Mars → Earth) (this REPO)


Intended audience

  • Aerospace enthusiasts
  • KSP / RO users
  • Systems & architecture engineers
  • Readers interested in launch vehicle design tradeoffs

Can the Saturn V architecture/design be reborn for a new Mars mission, using current and available technology?

Yes — it can. If we scale the Aris-I solid booster concept to Mars-class payloads, and replace the S-II and S-IVB with modern, high-thrust methalox engines, we can create a credible Apollo-derived architecture for Mars missions.


ApolloXM for Mars, just Like apolloX demonstrates that the Saturn V launch architecture remains viable when implemented with modern propulsion, materials, and avionics.

By replacing:

  • Engines
  • Propellants
  • Materials
  • Avionics

By Keeping:

  • Staging logic
  • Mass-flow philosophy
  • Mission decomposition
  • The same mission goals and constraints

Main realistic mods:

  • pmborg
  • RealFuels
  • RO Tanks
  • SolverEngines
  • Real Scale Boosters
  • RSS
  • TweakScale
  • CryoTanks
  • SystemHeat
  • ProceduralParts
Installed Mod List (Click to expand)
AmpYear (AmpYearPowerManager 1:V1.5.9.0)
Animated Decouplers (AnimatedDecouplers v1.5.0)
Antenna Helper (AntennaHelper 2:1.0.7.8)
AT Utils (AT-Utils v1.10.1)
B9 Part Switch (B9PartSwitch v2.21.0.4)
Background Resources (BackgroundResources 1:v0.18.0.0)
BahamutoD Animation Modules (BDAnimationModules 1:v0.6.7.1)
BetterCrewAssignment (BetterCrewAssignment 1.4.1)
Bluedog Design Bureau (BluedogDB v1.14.0)
BreakingGround-DLC (BreakingGround-DLC 1.7.1 (unmanaged))
ClickThrough Blocker (ClickThroughBlocker 1:2.1.10.22)
Community Category Kit (CommunityCategoryKit v112.0.1)
Community Resource Pack (CommunityResourcePack v112.0.1)
Community Tech Tree (CommunityTechTree 1:3.4.5)
Contract Configurator (ContractConfigurator v2.12.0.0)
Craft Manager (CraftManager 1.2.0)
Cryo Tanks (CryoTanks 1.6.7)
Cryo Tanks Core (CryoTanks-Core 1.6.7)
Deployable Engines Plugin (DeployableEngines 1.3.1)
DMModuleScienceAnimateGeneric (DMagicScienceAnimate v0.23)
Docking Port Alignment Indicator (DockingPortAlignmentIndicator 6.12.0.0)
Draggable Navball (DraggableNavball v1.0.1.5)
Dynamic Battery Storage (DynamicBatteryStorage 2:2.3.7.0)
Easy Vessel Switch (EVS) (EasyVesselSwitch 2.3)
Environmental Visual Enhancements Redux (EnvironmentalVisualEnhancements 3:1.11.7.2)
FASA (FASA 1:v7.2.7)
Filter Extensions - Plugin (FilterExtensions 3.2.9.1)
Flight Manager for Reusable Stages (FMRS) Continued (FMRSContinued 1.2.9.6)
FreeIva (FreeIva 0.2.20.2)
Fuel Tanks Plus (FuelTanksPlus 2.0.2)
Hangar (Hangar 3.6.2.2)
Hangar Extender (HangerExtenderExtended 3.6.1)
Harmony 2 (Harmony2 2.2.1.0)
Heat Control (HeatControl 0.6.2)
HullcamVDS Continued (HullcamVDSContinued 0.2.2.4)
Kerbal Alarm Clock (KerbalAlarmClock v3.14.0.0)
Kerbal Attachment System (KAS 1.12)
Kerbal Changelog (KerbalChangelog v1.4.2)
Kerbal Engineer Redux (KerbalEngineerRedux 1.1.9.5)
Kerbal Inventory System (KIS 1.29)
Kerbal Joint Reinforcement Continued (KerbalJointReinforcementContinued v3.8.6.0)
Kerbal Reusability Expansion (SpaceXLegs 2.9.3)
KerbalX Part Mapper (PartMapper 0.4.2)
Kopernicus Planetary System Modifier (Kopernicus 2:release-1.12.1-235)
kOS KerbalEngineer (kOS-KerbalEngineer v0.1.1)
kOS.MechJeb2.Addon (kOS-MechJeb2 0.0.4)
kOS: Scriptable Autopilot System (kOS 1:1.2.1.0)
KSC Switcher (KSCSwitcher v2.2.0.0)
KSP Community Fixes (KSPCommunityFixes 1.39.1)
KSP Recall (KSP-Recall v0.5.0.2)
KSP Texture Loader (KSPTextureLoader 0.0.22)
KSPBurst Compiler (KSPBurst v1.5.5.2)
KSPBurst Plugins (KSPBurst-Lite v1.5.5.2)
KXAPI (KXAPI 1.2.0)
Lunar Transfer Planner (LunarTransferPlanner v1.0.0)
MakingHistory-DLC (MakingHistory-DLC 1.12.1 (unmanaged))
MechJeb 2 (MechJeb2 2.15.1.0)
Moar Filter Extension Configs (MoarFEConfigs 1.0.5.2)
ModularFlightIntegrator (ModularFlightIntegrator 1.2.10.0)
Module Manager (ModuleManager 4.2.3)
Near Future IVA Props (NearFutureProps 1:0.7.2)
Near Future Solar (NearFutureSolar 1.3.3)
Near Future Solar Core (NearFutureSolar-Core 1.3.3)
Neptune Camera (NeptuneCamera v4.3)
Parachutes? Let's Use Maths! (PLUM 1:1.1.4)
PartInfo (PartInfo 0.0.8)
Patch Manager (PatchManager 0.0.17.7)
Procedural Parts (ProceduralParts v2.8.0.0)
Real Fuels (RealFuels 1:v15.12.0.0)
Real Scale Boosters (RealScaleBoosters 0.16)
Real Solar System (RealSolarSystem v20.1.3.0)
Real Solar System Textures - 4096 x 2048 (RSSTextures4096 v18.6.1)
RealChute Parachute Systems (RealChute v1.4.9.5)
RealFuels-Stock (RealFuels-Stock v5.1.0)
RecoveryController (RecoveryController 0.0.4.3)
REPOSoftTech-Agencies (REPOSoftTech-Agencies V1.5.9.0)
Resurfaced (Resurfaced v1.3)
Retractable Lifting Surface Module (RetractableLiftingSurface 0.2.1.2)
RO Library (ROLib v2.0.0.0)
RO Solar (ROSolar v2.1.2.0)
RO Tanks (ROTanks v2.10.0.0)
ROUtils (ROUtils v1.1.1.0)
RSS DateTime Formatter (RSSDateTimeFormatter v1.12.1.0)
Scatterer (Scatterer 3:v0.0878)
Scatterer Default Config (Scatterer-config 3:v0.0878)
Scatterer Sunflare (Scatterer-sunflare 3:v0.0878)
Shabby (Shabby 0.4.2)
Ship Effects Continued (ShipEffectsContinued 1.0.13)
Simple Adjustable Fairings - Plugin (SimpleAdjustableFairings v1.12.0)
Solver Engines plugin (SolverEngines v3.14.0)
SpaceCore kOS Script Pack (kOS-SpaceCore 1.1.1)
SpaceTux Library (SpaceTuxLibrary 0.0.9)
SpaceX Launch Vehicles - Real Size (SpaceXLaunchVehicles 6.5)
SpaceY Expanded (SYX) by NecroBones (SpaceY-Expanded 2.0.1)
SpaceY Heavy Lifters (SYL) by NecroBones (SpaceY-Lifters 1:2.0.1.1)
System Heat (SystemHeat 0.8.2)
TAC Life Support (TACLS) (TACLS 1:v0.18.0.0)
Tantares SP - Soviet Space Probes (TantaresSP 6.0)
TextureReplacer (TextureReplacer v4.5.3)
Textures Unlimited (TexturesUnlimited 1.6.4.30)
Toolbar Controller (ToolbarController 1:0.1.9.14)
Trajectories (Trajectories v2.4.5.4)
Transfer Window Planner (TransferWindowPlanner v1.8.0.0)
Tundra Exploration - Stockalike Dragon V2 and Falcon 9 (TundraExploration 4.1.0)
Tundra Techonologies (TundraTechnologies 7.1.2)
TweakScale - Rescale Everything! (TweakScale v2.4.8.6)
TweakScale Companion (the "UberPaket") (TweakScaleCompanion 2025.12.12.1)
TweakScale Redistributable (TweakScale-Redist v2.4.8.6)
USI Tools (USITools v112.0.1)
Waterfall Core (Waterfall 0.10.5)
Zero MiniAVC (ZeroMiniAVC 1:1.1.3.3)

ApolloXM — Mars Mission Architecture

ApolloXM is the Mars extension of the ApolloX project.

While ApolloX focuses on lunar missions, ApolloXM explores a realistic, staged Mars architecture based on the same core principles:

  • payload before crew,
  • return capability before departure,
  • mass efficiency over spectacle,
  • mission logic over brute force.

This repository defines the spacecraft, staging, and mission flow. Automation (KOS) will be added later, once the architecture is stable.

Mission Sequence

ApolloXM is not a single launch mission.

Each vehicle exists for a specific role:

  • Apollo-XM-1F — Fuel delivery (fuel is the payload)
  • Apollo-XM-1L — Life support and consumables
  • Apollo-XM-1C — Crew mission
  • Apollo-XM-2R — Return vehicle, injected to Mars orbit in advance

No crew is launched without a confirmed return path.

ApolloXM Mission Architecture — Sequenced Mars Surface Campaign

ApolloXM is not a single launch mission.
It is a staged, pre-positioned Mars surface architecture designed for safety, redundancy, and controlled mass scaling.

The missions are executed in the following order:


1️⃣ Apollo-XM-1F — Fuel Delivery

Payload: Surface propellant infrastructure
Role: Establish surface ascent capability before any crew is committed.

  • Fuel is the payload.
  • Uncrewed, autonomous landing.
  • Provides ascent propellant for later crew departure.
  • Acts as the core surface logistics anchor.

No crew lands until fuel is already waiting on Mars.


2️⃣ Apollo-XM-1L — Life Support & Consumables

Payload: Life support systems and consumables
Role: Surface habitation readiness

  • Lands near XM-1F fuel depot.
  • Higher Δv margin for landing precision.
  • Provides environmental systems, reserves, and redundancy.

Surface survival capability is established before crew arrival.


3️⃣ Apollo-XM-1C — Crew Mission

Payload: Crew + Ascent Mission Module (AMM)
Role: Human Mars landing

  • Lands near previously deployed 1F and 1L assets.
  • Includes 3 crew seats.
  • Equipped with AMM (4 engines) for Mars ascent.
  • Uses pre-positioned surface fuel.

Crew never depends on assets that are not already verified on the surface.


4️⃣ Apollo-XM-2R — Return Vehicle (Pre-Deployed)

Configuration: Two-stage RS-25 propulsion stack
Role: Mars orbit return platform

  • Injected to Mars orbit in advance.
  • Includes fuel and life support for return trip.
  • Remains in stable Mars orbit awaiting crew rendezvous.

Stage Overview:

  • Stage 1: High-thrust departure stage
  • Stage 2: Trans-Earth injection and return systems

The return vehicle is waiting in Mars orbit before the crew ever departs Earth.


5️⃣ ApolloX Lunar Retrieval

After Mars ascent and rendezvous with XM-2R:

  • Crew returns toward Earth–Moon system.
  • ApolloX mission performs lunar-orbit interception.
  • Final recovery occurs in Moon orbit.

Earth reentry mass is minimized.
Lunar orbit becomes the controlled recovery node.


Architectural Principles

  • Pre-position critical infrastructure before crew launch.
  • Surface fuel exists before ascent is required.
  • Return vehicle exists before departure from Earth.
  • Each step reduces risk through sequencing, not complexity.

ApolloXM is not expansion-based colonization.

It is controlled, geometric scaling of the Apollo principle to interplanetary distances.

Descent & Landing Module (DMM)

ApolloXM Mars Descent & Landing Module

Parameter ApolloXM DMM
Primary Role Mars orbital braking, powered descent, landing
Crew No (autonomous / remotely supervised)
Mission Domain Mars atmosphere and surface
Architecture Dedicated descent & landing module
Main Engines Multi-engine, distributed configuration
Propellant Aerozine-50 / NTO (hypergolic)
Engine Type Deep-throttle, restartable
Thrust (Mars ATM) ~637 kN total
Thrust (Vac) ~640 kN total
Isp (Vac) ~323 s
Engine Mass ~0.25 t (total propulsion system)
Tank Pressurization Helium
Ignition Capability Multiple (hypergolic)
Throttle Capability Yes (precision Mars landing)
Redundancy Multi-engine + distributed tankage
Reusability Single mission (Mars surface)
Design Philosophy Reliability-first, controllability over minimum mass
Total Mass DMM ~122.3 t

Ascent & Launch Module (ALM Propulsion Stack)

ApolloXM Mars Ascent Module

Parameter ApolloXM AMM
Primary Role Mars surface ascent to low Mars orbit
Crew No (autonomous / remotely supervised)
Mission Domain Mars surface → Mars orbit
Architecture Dedicated ascent module mounted above DMM
Main Engines 4 × Mk-55 “Thud” liquid fuel engines
Propellant Aerozine-50 / NTO (hypergolic)
Engine Type Deep-throttle, restartable
Thrust (Mars ATM) ~476.6 kN total
Thrust (Vac) ~480 kN total
TWR (Mars, ATM) ~4.47
Isp (Vac) ~325 s
Engine Mass ~0.76 t (4 × 0.19 t)
Tank Pressurization Helium
Ignition Capability Multiple (hypergolic)
Throttle Capability Yes (precise ascent & attitude control)
Redundancy Multi-engine + reaction wheels
Reusability Single mission (Mars ascent)
Design Philosophy Control authority first, ascent reliability over minimum mass
Total Mass AMM ~27.4 t

DMM Mars Descent & Landing Procedure

ApolloXM Mars Descent & Landing Module (DMM)

This procedure is based on repeated, successful Mars landings using the ApolloXM DMM and is considered stable, reliable, and pilot-memorizable. Altitude references are Radar Altitude (RA) unless stated otherwise.

Initial Conditions

  • Initial orbit altitude: ~212 km
  • Initial orbital velocity: ~3.45 km/s
  • Reference altitude: Radar Altitude (RA) — altitude above terrain, not sea level

Entry & Initial Braking

  • Initial conditions:
    • Altitude: ~212 km
    • Velocity: ~3455 m/s
  • Orientation: Retrograde
  • Throttle: 66%

Powered Descent Phases

High-Altitude Braking

  • At 60 km RA
    • Reference speed: ~1100 m/s
    • Throttle: 100%

Mid-Descent Control

  • At 20 km RA
    • Reference speed: ~350 m/s
    • Throttle: 33%

Low-Altitude Controlled Descent

  • Below 1200 m RA
    • Hold vertical speed ≈ 30 m/s

Precision Descent Window

  • Between 200 m RA → 100 m RA
    • Gradually reduce speed from 30 m/s → 10 m/s
    • Transition to fine throttle control

Final Landing Rule (Critical)

  • Below 100 m RA, apply the rule:

    Target vertical speed = Altitude / 10 (integer)

    Examples:

    • 90 m → 9 m/s
    • 50 m → 5 m/s
    • 20 m → 2 m/s
  • Final meters:

    • Target touchdown speed: 0.5–1.0 m/s
    • Vertical only, no lateral correction unless required

Notes

  • This profile is robust and repeatable.
  • Once learned, it becomes instinctive (“ride-a-bike rule”).
  • Closely matches real-world Mars powered descent logic.

Key Operational Notes

  • Radar Altitude (RA) is critical; do not rely on sea-level altitude
  • Throttle changes should be smooth and anticipatory
  • The procedure prioritizes control authority and predictability over fuel minimization
  • Typical residual Δv after landing: ~100–300 m/s
  • The profile is robust and repeatable once learned

“Once you learn it, you never forget it — like riding a bike.”


Design Philosophy

This landing method reflects Apollo-style powered descent logic, adapted to Mars:

  • Continuous braking
  • No suicide burn
  • No last-second throttle spikes
  • Pilot-friendly timing and margins

Mission Variants

  • C — Crew
  • L — Logistics
  • R — Return / Upgrade

🌕 Apollo-X (Moon Program)

Monolithic Architecture

  • All-in-one
  • Single launch
  • Short duration
  • C + L + R together

This program mirrors classic Apollo lunar missions: one stack, one launch, one landing, one return.


🔴 Apollo-XM (Mars Program)

Distributed Architecture

  • Modular
  • Multiple launches
  • Long duration
  • C, L, R separated

Apollo-XM is a campaign-style program where mission roles are split across dedicated vehicles.


Apollo-X/XM Crafts:

- Ships/VAB/Apollo-X/

  • Apollo-X-v3_3.craft
  • Apollo-X-v3_2.craft

- Ships/VAB/Apollo-XM/

  • ├─ Apollo-XM-1F-Lander.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-1L-Lander.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-1C-Lander.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-2R-Vehicle.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-1F-Stack-v1_6.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-1L-Stack-v1_6.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-1C-Stack-v1_6.craft
  • ├─ Apollo-XM-2R-Stack-v1_6.craft
  • └─ Apollo-XM-v1_6.craft

Vehicle Roles

  • Apollo-XM-1F — Fuel Lander
  • Apollo-XM-1L — Life Support Lander
  • Apollo-XM-1C — Crewed Mars Lander
  • Apollo-XM-2R — Return / Upgrade Vehicle

Naming Doctrine

  • Craft files define hardware geometry only
  • Mission duration, crew count, and consumables are handled by configuration
  • Launchers are interchangeable infrastructure
  • Names reflect function, not iteration history

Missions keep their names.
Launchers evolve underneath them.

Runtime Configuration (ModuleManager)

This program relies on a set of custom ModuleManager patches installed under Kerbal Space Program/GameData/.

These patches modify engines, tanks, life support, staging, and realism parameters used by both Apollo-X and Apollo-XM.

They are global runtime configurations, not craft-specific assets.

Craft files do not embed these settings.


ModuleManager Patch Overview (Runtime Layer)

Apollo-X and Apollo-XM rely on a shared set of custom ModuleManager patches installed under:

Kerbal Space Program/GameData/

These patches define the physical simulation environment used by all craft in this repository.

Patch Categories

Engine & Propulsion

  • Engine thrust and ISP corrections
  • Ullage and ignition behavior
  • Upper-stage restart reliability
  • Saturn, Falcon, Agena realism tuning

Tank & Mass Corrections

  • Real propellant densities
  • LM and Saturn tank mass fixes
  • Procedural tank enforcement
  • Cryogenic vs storable propellant behavior

Structural & Staging Fixes

  • Interstage separation behavior
  • Decoupler corrections
  • Fairing and adapter fixes
  • Landing leg stability

Life Support Integration

  • TAC Life Support configuration
  • Crew capacity normalization
  • Cross-compatibility with capsules and habitats

Naming Conventions

  • fix-* → Corrects broken or unrealistic behavior
  • procedural-* → Enforces procedural part constraints
  • RSB* → Realism subsystem patches
  • zzz_* → Late-load order enforcement

Important Note

These patches are global runtime configuration. They apply equally to Apollo-X and Apollo-XM.

Craft files define hardware geometry only and do not embed engine, tank, or life-support parameters.


Runtime Configuration (GameData)

The GameData/ directory contains custom ModuleManager patches and plugins used to enforce realistic behavior across all craft.

These patches apply globally and are shared by:

  • Apollo-X (Moon)
  • Apollo-XM (Mars)

They are not craft-specific and must remain in GameData/ for proper operation.

GameData/Pmborg/

Contains custom realism patches developed for Apollo-style vehicles:

  • Saturn stage mass and tank corrections
  • LM tank and ascent-stage behavior
  • Procedural tank enforcement
  • Decoupler and interstage fixes
  • Ullage and ignition behavior

GameData/Pmborg-RealFalcons/

Contains engine, tank, and structural realism patches originally developed for Falcon and Starship systems, reused here for shared physics consistency:

  • Engine ISP and thrust corrections
  • Fuel density fixes
  • Landing leg stability
  • Solar panel and RCS fixes
  • TAC Life Support integration

GameData/000-Pmborg-RealFalcons/

Contains early-load compatibility patches.

The 000- prefix ensures correct load order before other ModuleManager patches are applied.

Important CRITICAL warning:

  • Do NOT move or rename files inside GameData/
  • Do NOT place .craft files inside GameData/
  • Craft files define vehicle geometry only
  • Physical behavior is controlled by ModuleManager patches


Stage 1 Reference Comparison — Apollo-XM vs Hypothetical Saturn-V (8 × F-1B)

To fairly contextualize Apollo-XM Stage 1, it is compared not with the flown Saturn-V, but with a credible Saturn-V evolution that never flew:
a first stage using eight F-1B engines.

This represents the upper practical limit of kerolox-heavy booster scaling.


First Stage Engine Architecture Comparison

Parameter Saturn-V (8 × F-1B, hypothetical) Apollo-XM Stage 1
Engine Type F-1B Mk4 RAP-39000-B “Kingfisher”
Engine Count 8 7 clusters
Propellant RP-1 / LOX LCH₄ / LOX
Thrust per Engine (ASL) 8,000 kN 65,709.9 kN
Thrust per Engine (Vac) 9,000 kN 71,306.1 kN
Total Thrust (ASL) ~64 MN ~460 MN
Total Thrust (Vac) ~72 MN ~499 MN
ISP (ASL) ~280 s 364 s
ISP (Vac) ~315 s 395 s
Engine Mass (each) 7.5 t 20.3 t
Combustion Cycle Gas-generator Full-flow staged combustion
Power Generation Minimal 300 EC/s per cluster
Throttle Capability Limited Full
Restart Capability Limited Yes

Architectural Interpretation

  • 8 × F-1B Saturn-V represents the maximum plausible evolution of Apollo-era technology
  • It achieves high thrust, but:
    • Lower ISP
    • Higher propellant mass
    • Limited throttling and restart capability
  • Apollo-XM Stage 1 exceeds this limit by changing the propulsion paradigm:
    • Methalox instead of kerolox
    • Full-flow staged combustion
    • Extreme parallel clustering
    • Higher efficiency at all ascent regimes

Design Conclusion

Apollo-XM Stage 1 is not an over-scaled Saturn-V.

It is what Saturn-V might have become if:

  • combustion physics had advanced,
  • methalox propulsion were available,
  • and Mars-class payloads had driven the requirements.

Apollo-XM preserves Apollo’s thrust-first philosophy —
but removes the chemical and structural limits of the 1960s.

Historical note — Saturn S-IC-8

The comparison baseline uses a hypothetical but historically grounded Saturn V variant.

NASA studies in the late Apollo era defined S-IC-8, a first-stage upgrade designed to fly with eight F-1–class engines instead of five.

The S-IC-8 tank was:

  • lengthened and structurally reinforced
  • designed for higher thrust loading
  • intended to support advanced Apollo, Mars, and nuclear upper-stage missions

This configuration represents the maximum credible evolution of Saturn V within kerolox chemical propulsion.



Apollo-XM — Stage 1

Atmospheric Lift & Gravity Well Escape (Integrated Booster Stage)

Stage 1 is a single integrated launch stage combining solid radial boosters and a central super-heavy clustered engine core.
Both systems ignite at liftoff and operate in parallel to maximize thrust-to-weight during the atmospheric ascent phase.


Stage 1 — Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role Atmospheric lift & initial gravity well escape
Vehicle Apollo-XM Launch Vehicle — Stage 1
Architecture Integrated core + radial boosters
Staging Philosophy Parallel burn, booster separation
Structural Role Primary atmospheric booster stage
Reusability Engine hardware reusable (design intent)

Propulsion Subsystems (Stage 1)

Radial Solid Boosters (×8)

Parameter Value
Booster Count 8 radial boosters
Booster Type Ares-I Solid Rocket Booster (scaled)
Scale Factor 240 %
Propellant Solid Fuel
Thrust per Booster (ASL) 1,444.8 kN
Thrust per Booster (Vac) 1,600.0 kN
Total Booster Thrust (ASL) ~11.6 MN
Total Booster Thrust (Vac) ~12.8 MN
ISP (ASL / Vac) 242 s / 268 s
Gimbal Range 8.0°
Throttle Control None (solid)
Mass Accounting — Solid Boosters (RealFuels)
Mass Component Value (per booster)
Dry Mass (structure) ~1,327 t
Propellant Mass (Solid Fuel) ~8,361 t
Total Mass (per booster) ~9,688 t
Total Booster Mass (×8) ~77,500 t

Note:
In RealFuels / RealScaleBoosters, fuel mass is stored separately from part dry mass.
The extreme total mass reflects 240% scaling, where volume (and propellant mass) grows cubically.


Central Engine Core (×7 Clusters)

Parameter Value
Engine Class Super Heavy Booster Cluster Engine
Engine Implementation Mk4 RAP-39000-B “Kingfisher”
Engine Count 7 clusters
Propellant LCH₄ / LOX
Thrust per Cluster (ASL) 65,709.9 kN
Thrust per Cluster (Vac) 71,306.1 kN
Total Core Thrust (ASL) ~460 MN class
Total Core Thrust (Vac) ~499 MN class
ISP (ASL / Vac) 364 s / 395 s
Engine Mass (per cluster) 20.3 t
Total Engine Mass ~142 t
Throttle Control Full
Gimbal Enabled

Design Notes

  • Solid boosters provide immediate thrust dominance at liftoff
  • Kingfisher clusters sustain high-efficiency thrust through max-Q and upper atmosphere
  • The combined system replaces Saturn-V-style sequential staging with extreme parallel thrust
  • Very high thrust margin compensates for:
    • Exceptionally heavy upper stages
    • Long-duration Mars mission payloads
    • Conservative, pilot-friendly ascent profiles

This is architectural continuity, not replication:
Apollo-XM preserves Apollo’s thrust-first philosophy while scaling it to Mars-class mission requirements.

Stage 1 — Propulsion Performance Breakdown

Stage 1 operates as a single continuous burn, but Kerbal Engineer Redux reports two distinct performance regimes due to changing vehicle mass and effective ISP.


Stage 1A — Integrated Boosters + Core Engines (Liftoff Phase)

Parameter v1.6 (8×240% + 7 Raptor Clusters) v1.7 (16 × (2 × 150%) + 1 Raptor Cluster)
Active Propulsion Solid boosters + Kingfisher clusters Solid boosters (dual geometry) + Kingfisher clusters
Effective ISP 312.3 s ~Improved mass-weighted ISP
Total Thrust 1,641,332 kN Increased (geometry-optimized)
TWR (Max) 1.24 (3.50) ~1.03 → 2.09 dynamic ramp
Δv Contribution 3,172 m/s ~3,3xx m/s (flight-verified)
Burn Time 2m 34s Slightly extended due to scaling

This phase provides maximum thrust dominance during liftoff and early atmospheric ascent, at the cost of lower effective ISP due to solid propellant contribution.


Stage 1B — Core Engines Only (Post-Booster Separation)

Parameter v1.6 (7 Raptor Clusters) v1.7 (7 Raptor Clusters)
Active Propulsion 7 Kingfisher clusters 7 Kingfisher clusters
Effective ISP 395.0 s 395.0 s
Total Thrust 499,143 kN Same
TWR (Max) 1.38 (3.86) Slightly improved due to lower initial mass
Δv Contribution 3,996 m/s ~5,067 m/s (core fuel now dominant)
Burn Time 3m 04s Extended — full core utilization

Note: Engines do not restart.
This phase is a continuation of the same ignition after booster separation.

Apollo-XM-1L-Stack: v1.6 vs v1.7 Propulsion Performance Comparison

The solid booster configuration used in v1.7 is conceptually based on the Ares I First Stage Booster, a five-segment solid rocket motor derived from the Space Shuttle Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs).

It was designed to provide the initial thrust required to launch the Orion spacecraft as part of NASA’s Constellation Program.

In the Apollo-XM-1L project, this booster serves as a conceptual architectural reference rather than a direct reproduction of the real Ares I performance specifications.

Total Vehicle Δv Comparison (Apollo-XM-1L-Stack)

Configuration Booster Layout Stage 1 Δv Total Δv
v1.6 8 × 240% 6,546 m/s 22,162 m/s
v1.7 16 Booster Units (2 × 150% each) 6,783 m/s 22,381 m/s

Note: Each booster unit consists of two 150% scaled solid motors mounted as a single structural pair. Separation events occur at the unit level (16 total), not per individual motor.


Stage 1 — Operational Summary

  • Stage 1 uses one ignition and one continuous burn
  • KER separates reporting due to mass and ISP transitions
  • Total engine runtime is the sum of both phases
  • No coast, no shutdown, no restart


Apollo-XM — Stage 2

High-Altitude / Orbital Acceleration

Stage 2 represents the first true upper stage of the Apollo-XM launch vehicle.
Although Kerbal Space Program assigns multiple numeric stages due to decouplers and booster separation, Stage 2 is architecturally defined by propulsion role, not by KSP stage numbering.

Stage 2 begins at KER stage S4.


Stage 2 — Entry Conditions

Stage 2 ignition occurs immediately after completion of Stage 1 atmospheric lift and booster separation, under the following flight conditions:

Parameter Value
Entry Altitude 268.5 km
Entry Velocity 4,965 m/s
Atmospheric Regime Upper atmosphere / near-vacuum
Guidance Mode High-altitude ascent & orbital acceleration

At ignition, the vehicle has already cleared the dense atmospheric regime.
Stage 2 therefore operates as a super-heavy high-altitude accelerator, bridging the gap between atmospheric ascent and true orbital insertion.

This stage assumes the role traditionally split between upper first-stage burnout and classical second-stage acceleration in Saturn-era launch vehicles.


Stage 2 — Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role High-altitude acceleration & orbital insertion
Vehicle Apollo-XM Launch Vehicle — Stage 2
KSP Stage Index S4
Architecture Vacuum-optimized, thrust-first
Structural Role Upper ascent / orbital injection stage
Restart Capability Multiple (design-enabled)
Reusability Not reused

Propulsion System

Parameter Value
Engine Class Vacuum-optimized methalox engine
Engine Implementation Mk4 RAP-39000-B “Kingfisher” (vacuum regime)
Engine Count 1 cluster
Propellant LCH₄ / LOX
Thrust (Vacuum) 71,306.1 kN
ISP (Vacuum) 395 s
Throttle Control Full
Gimbal Enabled

Performance (KER Reference)

Parameter Value
Effective ISP 395.0 s
Total Thrust 71,306.1 kN
TWR (Max) 0.91 (1.73)
Δv Contribution 2,481 m/s (of 9,650 m/s remaining)
Burn Time 3m 24s

Operational Role (Apollo-XM)

Stage 2 performs:

  • Sustained acceleration above the dense atmosphere
  • Completion of Earth orbital insertion
  • Velocity shaping for Earth escape
  • Preparation for continuous burn injection strategy
  • Minimization of gravity and cosine losses

Stage 2 is not payload-optimized.
It is architecture-optimized, prioritizing thrust continuity and ascent stability over absolute mass efficiency.


Architectural Interpretation

Stage 2 preserves the Saturn V S-II role, but replaces:

  • hydrogen complexity
  • low thrust-to-weight ratios

with:

  • methalox simplicity
  • higher thrust margins
  • improved guidance authority
  • seamless integration with continuous-burn interplanetary injection

This reflects architectural continuity, not replication: the staging logic remains Apollo-derived, while propulsion technology evolves.

In summary, Stage 2 functions as a super-heavy booster operating in vacuum.

The fundamental difference relative to Stage 1 is not architectural, but environmental: Stage 2 ignites at approximately 268.5 km altitude and ~4.97 km/s velocity, inherited directly from Stage 1.

From this point onward, Stage 2 continues aggressive thrust-first acceleration outside the atmosphere, prioritizing velocity accumulation and orbital energy rather than lift.



Apollo-XM — Stage 3

High-Altitude / Orbital Acceleration (S3)

Stage 3 represents the final high-thrust acceleration stage of the Apollo-XM launch vehicle. Although numbered as S3 in KSP by coincidence, its operational role is consistent with a classical orbital acceleration stage, operating entirely above the sensible atmosphere.

Stage 3 ignites after completion of the super-heavy booster phases and continues velocity build-up toward orbital insertion and mission-specific departure profiles.


Stage 3 — Entry Conditions

Stage 3 ignition occurs after completion of the super-heavy booster phases, under the following flight conditions:

Parameter Value
Entry Altitude 432.5 km
Entry Velocity 7,093 m/s
Atmospheric Regime Near-vacuum
Guidance Mode Vacuum-optimized ascent

At ignition, the vehicle is already well above the dense atmosphere, allowing Stage 3 to operate entirely as a high-efficiency orbital acceleration system, unconstrained by aerodynamic or thermal limits.


Stage 3 — Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role High-altitude & orbital acceleration
Vehicle Apollo-XM Launch Vehicle — Stage 3
KSP Stage ID S3
Architecture Multi-engine liquid propulsion stage
Operating Regime Near-vacuum / vacuum
Structural Role Final ascent propulsion stage
Restart Capability Enabled

Propulsion System (Stage 3)

Parameter Value
Engine Type RS-25 (Space Shuttle Main Engine)
Engine Count 5 × RS-25
Propellant RP-1 / LOX
Thrust (ASL) ~9,225 kN
Thrust (Vac) ~11,395 kN
ISP (ASL / Vac) ~452 s / ~452 s
Gimbal Range 10.5°
Throttle Control Full
Engine Mass (total) ~19.5 t

Performance (KSP Engineer — S3)

Metric Value
TWR (max) 0.31 (0.77)
Δv (Stage / Total) 4,007 / 13,657 m/s
Burn Time 14m 23s

Operational Role

Stage 3 performs:

  • Final atmospheric exit (upper fringe)
  • Primary orbital velocity accumulation
  • Orbit shaping and circularization
  • Injection setup for downstream mission phases

Unlike a payload-optimized upper stage, Stage 3 preserves thrust-first logic, ensuring stable guidance, controllability, and generous margins for heavy Mars-class payloads.


Architectural Interpretation

Stage 3 completes the Apollo-XM ascent stack by:

  • Using multiple high-ISP engines for redundancy and control authority
  • Operating exclusively in low-drag conditions
  • Maintaining Apollo-style continuous acceleration
  • Avoiding coast-heavy or fragile staging strategies

This ensures operational robustness over minimum-mass optimization, consistent with the Apollo-XM philosophy of reliability-first design.



Apollo-XM — Stage 4

Orbital Acceleration & Injection (Final Booster Stage)

Important staging note:
In Kerbal Space Program, decouplers and separations are counted as stages.
Apollo-XM Stage 4 corresponds to KSP stage S2.

Stage 4 is the final propulsion stage of the Apollo-XM launch architecture.
It receives a vehicle that is already escaping Earth’s gravity well and performs the final orbital energy shaping and injection burn.


Stage 4 — Entry Conditions

Parameter Value
Entry Altitude ~1,473 km
Entry Velocity ~9,968 m/s
Orbital State Earth-relative, committed escape trajectory
Delivered By Apollo-XM Stage 3

Stage 4 — Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role Final orbital acceleration & injection
Vehicle Apollo-XM Launch Vehicle — Stage 4
Architecture Single-engine liquid stage
Structural Role Orbital injector
Restart Capability Enabled
Throttle Control Full

Propulsion System (Stage 4)

RS-25 Main Engine

Parameter Value
Engine Type RS-25 (Space Shuttle Main Engine)
Engine Count 1 × RS-25
Propellant RP-1 / LOX
Thrust (ASL) ~1,844 kN
Thrust (Vac) ~2,279 kN
ISP (ASL / Vac) ~366 s / ~452 s
Gimbal Range ~10.5°
Engine Restart Enabled

Performance Summary (Stage 4)

Parameter Value
TWR (max) ~0.91 (1.73)
Δv Contribution ~2,481 m/s
Burn Time ~3 min 24 s
KSP Stage ID S2

Operational Role

Stage 4 operates entirely outside the atmosphere and performs:

  • Precise acceleration while already escaping Earth
  • Energy trimming of a hyperbolic trajectory
  • Final injection cleanup for interplanetary transfer readiness

This stage does not provide lift —
it operates purely as a precision orbital injector.


Architectural Interpretation

Stage 4 is the Apollo-XM analogue of the Saturn V S-IVB, but pushed to much higher entry energy:

  • Single, high-efficiency engine
  • Long-duration, controlled burn
  • Restart capability for trajectory shaping

Apollo-XM preserves Apollo’s staging logic while scaling velocity, altitude, and mission scope to Mars-class escape conditions.



Apollo-XM — Stage 5

Interplanetary Injection & Mars Orbit Shaping

Stage 5 is the final propulsion stage of the Apollo-XM launch stack.
It completes Mars Injection, performs all interplanetary correction maneuvers,
and executes a two-pass Mars orbital capture strategy using continuous braking logic.

This stage operates entirely in vacuum and remains attached until stable Mars orbit conditions are achieved.


Stage 5 — Entry Conditions

Parameter Value
Orbital Frame Sun-centric (heliocentric)
Entry Location Post-Earth SOI exit
Entry Velocity (heliocentric) ≥ 33,000 m/s
Orbital State Interplanetary transfer to Mars
Delivered By Apollo-XM Stage 4

Stage 5 — Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role Mars injection, transfer correction, orbital capture
Vehicle Apollo-XM Launch Vehicle — Stage 5
Architecture Single-engine liquid stage
Structural Role Interplanetary propulsion stage
Restart Capability Enabled (multiple restarts)
Throttle Control Full

Propulsion System (Stage 5)

RS-25 Main Engine

Parameter Value
Engine Type RS-25 (Space Shuttle Main Engine)
Engine Count 1 × RS-25
Propellant RP-1 / LOX
Thrust (ASL) ~1,844 kN
Thrust (Vac) ~2,279 kN
ISP (ASL / Vac) ~366 s / ~452 s
Gimbal Range ~10.5°
Engine Restart Enabled

Performance Summary (Stage 5)

Parameter Value
Primary Function Mars Injection + Orbital Capture
Δv Allocation Mars transfer + corrections
Burn Profile Multiple long-duration burns
Operational Mode Continuous braking (no suicide burn)

Mars Capture Strategy

Stage 5 executes a two-pass Mars orbit insertion, optimized for control and margins:

  1. Initial Mars Encounter

    • Elliptical capture orbit
    • Initial periapsis (PE): ~56 km
    • Continuous retro-burn at periapsis
  2. Second Periapsis Pass

    • Orbit refinement
    • Final periapsis (PE): ~50 km
    • Transition to stable Mars orbit

This approach minimizes:

  • peak thermal loads
  • extreme thrust spikes
  • last-second braking risks

Design Notes

  • Stage 5 replaces a classical single-burn MOI with Apollo-style continuous braking
  • The RS-25 provides:
    • exceptional vacuum efficiency
    • fine throttle control
    • restart reliability for long missions
  • This stage remains attached until:
    • Mars orbit is stabilized
    • rendezvous or descent preparation begins

Stage 5 completes the Earth → Mars propulsion chain, delivering the Apollo-XM payload into a controlled, pilot-friendly Mars orbit.


Reusability Policy (Apollo-XM)

Apollo-XM follows a strict, physics-driven reusability rule.

Stage Reusability Reason
Stage 1 Recoverable (design intent) Atmospheric booster stage; sub-orbital energy allows controlled recovery
Stage 2 Not recoverable Excess orbital inertia after separation prevents return
Stage 3 Not recoverable High-energy orbital acceleration stage
Stage 4 Not recoverable Expended into heliocentric (Sun) orbit
Stage 5 Not recoverable Expended during Mars injection and lost during Mars atmospheric entry


Landers

All Apollo-XM landers are designed to enter Mars operations from a stable circular parking orbit, ensuring repeatable, low-risk deployment.

Default Entry Conditions (Common to All XM Landers)

Apollo-XM landers are equipped with auxiliary electric wheel assemblies intended for low-speed surface repositioning after touchdown.

These wheels are not rovers and are not designed for sustained traversal.

Parameter Value
Mobility Type Electric wheels (auxiliary)
Drive Purpose Fine positioning & short relocation
Recommended Max Speed ≤ 5 m/s
Absolute Limit Not defined (structural risk increases rapidly)
Steering Differential / limited steering
Power Source Onboard electric system
Terrain Assumption Flat to mildly uneven terrain

Surface speed limits are driven by inertial and structural considerations, not weight.


Operational Constraints

  • Speeds above 5 m/s are not recommended
  • Risks increase sharply beyond this limit:
    • wheel motor overheating
    • landing leg side-load amplification
    • structural fatigue at wheel attachment points
    • loss of traction on regolith
  • Wheels are intended for:
    • pad clearance
    • docking alignment
    • hazard avoidance
  • Wheels are not suitable for:
    • long-distance travel
    • slopes
    • rough terrain traversal

Primary surface mobility for Mars missions is expected to be provided by dedicated rovers, not landers.

This design preserves Apollo-style landing stability, with minimal but practical post-landing mobility.

Nominal Orbital Entry Conditions (All XM Landers)

Parameter Value
Target Orbit Circular Mars Orbit
Entry Altitude 212 km
Entry Velocity ~3,455 m/s
Environment Mars (thin atmosphere)

Mass & Gravity Context

Parameter Value
Lander Mass (Mars) ≈ 149.9 t
Mars Surface Gravity 0.38 g (Earth)
Effective Weight on Mars ≈ 57 t (Earth-equivalent)

While the mass is unchanged, the operational load on engines, legs, and wheels is significantly reduced.

Design Notes

  • Descent is fully propulsive (Apollo-style continuous braking)
  • No parachutes or aero capture reliance
  • Thrust margin allows:
    • Controlled descent
    • Hover / divert
    • Abort ascent if required
  • Engine clustering provides redundancy against single-engine failure

This configuration defines the baseline standard for all Apollo-XM landers.


Apollo-XM-1F — Fuel Lander

Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role Fuel delivery and surface propellant infrastructure
Vehicle Apollo-XM-1F Fuel Lander
Configuration Uncrewed, autonomous
Wet Mass ~149.9 t
Power Systems Passive
Structural Role Surface propellant depot

Although the lander mass is ~149 t, Mars gravity reduces effective surface weight to approximately 38% of Earth, significantly lowering static wheel and landing leg loads.


Propulsion System — Descent & Surface Operations

Main Engines (Descent / Ascent Assist)

Environment-corrected values (Mars atmosphere ≈ near-vacuum)

Apollo-XM Surface Lander Variants

Shared Propulsion Bus — Variant Payload Configurations

Apollo-XM-1F and Apollo-XM-1L share the same descent propulsion architecture and structural platform.
The difference lies in payload mass and mission role.


Common Propulsion System (XM-1 Bus)

Main Engines (Descent / Ascent Assist)

Parameter Value
Engine Type Gemini LR-91 Mini Rocket Engine
Engine Count 6
Propellant Aerozine-50 / NTO
Throttle Capability Yes
Restart Capability Yes (multiple ignitions)
Ullage Requirement Yes
Auto-Mobility Yes

Performance (Mars)

Parameter Value
Total Thrust (Mars ATM) ≈ 956 kN
Total Thrust (Vacuum) ≈ 960 kN
ISP (Mars ATM) ≈ 321.5 s
ISP (Vacuum) ≈ 323.0 s
Burn Time (full tanks) ≈ 6 min
TWR on Mars (max) ≈ 1.70

Variant Comparison

Parameter XM-1F (Fuel Lander) XM-1L (Life Support Lander)
Role Surface propellant depot Life support & consumables
Configuration Uncrewed Uncrewed
Wet Mass ≈ 149.9 t ≈ 131.7 t
Total Δv (Mars) ≈ 4,186 – 4,205 m/s ≈ 5,715 - 5,741 m/s
Structural Role Fuel storage Habitable systems supply

Although both landers have similar wet mass, the XM-1L allocates internal volume and mass to life-support consumables instead of surface propellant reserves, slightly reducing available Δv.

Mars gravity (~38% of Earth) significantly reduces effective landing loads for both configurations.


Architectural Role

  • Apollo-XM-1F is the first surface asset deployed in the Mars campaign.
  • Delivers ascent and surface propellant for later crew operations.
  • Uses Apollo-style continuous braking (no suicide burn).
  • No crew systems, no return capability.
  • After landing, the vehicle becomes permanent surface infrastructure.

This lander forms the logistics foundation of the Apollo-XM Mars architecture.


Apollo-XM-1C — Crew Lander

Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role Crewed Mars landing and ascent vehicle
Vehicle Apollo-XM-1C Crew Lander
Configuration Crewed (3 seats), autonomous descent
Wet Mass ~149.9 t (descent configuration)
Power Systems Passive / fuel-cell supported
Structural Role Crewed surface lander with integrated ascent module

Unlike XM-1F (Fuel Lander), XM-1C carries crew accommodations and a fully integrated Ascent Mission Module (AMM).


Propulsion System — Descent Phase

Main Engines (Descent)

Environment-corrected values (Mars atmosphere ≈ near-vacuum)

Parameter Value
Engine Type Gemini LR-91 Mini Rocket Engine
Engine Count 6
Propellant Aerozine-50 / NTO
Throttle Capability Yes
Restart Capability Yes (multiple ignitions)
Ullage Requirement Yes

Performance (Mars)

Parameter Value
Total Thrust (Mars ATM) ≈ 956 kN
ISP (Mars ATM) ≈ 321.5 s
Burn Time (full tanks) ≈ 6 min
Total Δv (Mars) ≈ 4,186 – 4,205 m/s
TWR on Mars (max) ≈ 1.70

Descent propulsion is identical in capability to XM-1F.


Ascent Mission Module (AMM)

Main Engines (Ascent)

Parameter Value
Engine Count 4
Configuration Dedicated ascent cluster
Propellant Aerozine-50 / NTO
Throttle Limited / mission-optimized

Ascent Performance (Mars)

Parameter Value
Total Δv (Mars Ascent) ≈ 5,361 m/s
Mission Role Surface-to-Mars-Orbit crew return

The AMM provides independent ascent capability to rendezvous with the pre-positioned return vehicle (XM-2R).


Mission Logic

  • XM-1F establishes propellant infrastructure.
  • XM-1L delivers life support and consumables.
  • XM-1C performs crewed descent and ascent.
  • XM-2R waits in Mars orbit for crew return.

Apollo-XM architecture separates descent mass from ascent survivability, maximizing robustness while preserving mission redundancy.


Apollo-XM-2R — Return Vehicle (Pre-Deployed to Mars Orbit)

Mission Role

Apollo-XM-2R is injected to Mars orbit in advance of the crew mission.
It serves as the Earth Return Vehicle (ERV), carrying:

  • Return propellant
  • Life support reserves for transit
  • Earth re-entry stack

This architecture removes ascent-to-transit mass from the surface mission, dramatically improving crew safety margins.


Hardware Overview

Parameter Value
Role Mars orbit return vehicle
Configuration Uncrewed pre-deployment
Engine Type RS-25 (Vacuum optimized)
Engine Count 1 per stage
Stage Count 2
Propellant LH2 / LOX
Power Systems Passive / minimal orbital support
Structural Role Earth return propulsion stack

Propulsion System

Stage S2 — Mars Orbit Injection / Departure Stage

Parameter Value
Vacuum ISP ≈ 452 s
Total Thrust ≈ 2,279 kN
Wet Mass ≈ 146.8 t
Dry Mass ≈ 78.6 t
Δv (Mars orbit) ≈ 2,946 m/s
Burn Time ≈ 2 min 19 s
TWR (Mars orbit) ≈ 4.13

This stage performs:

  • Trans-Earth Injection (TEI)
  • Major orbital corrections

Stage S0 — Final Return / Injection Assist

Parameter Value
Vacuum ISP ≈ 452 s
Total Thrust ≈ 2,279 kN
Wet Mass ≈ 64.6 t
Δv (vacuum) ≈ 9,501 m/s
Burn Time ≈ 1 min 51 s
TWR (Mars orbit) ≈ 9.39

This stage provides:

  • Final injection shaping
  • High-energy maneuver capability
  • Abort and contingency margin

Total Propulsive Capability

Combined Δv (usable mission stack):

≈ 2,946 m/s (primary stage)
≈ 9,501 m/s (upper stage capability envelope)

This provides:

  • Mars orbit departure margin
  • Trajectory correction margin
  • Safe Earth return window flexibility

Mission Architecture Logic

Apollo-XM-2R is deployed before crew arrival, ensuring:

  • Return vehicle is confirmed operational in Mars orbit
  • No dependence on surface fuel production
  • Surface crew only needs to reach orbit

This mirrors Apollo lunar logic:

“Return capability is guaranteed before descent.”


Structural Philosophy

  • High Isp hydrogen architecture
  • Extremely high TWR margin in Mars orbit
  • Minimal structural mass overhead
  • Dedicated life-support mass allowance for return transit

Apollo-XM-2R completes the closed-loop Mars mission architecture.

About

ApolloXM extends ApolloX into the super heavy-lift regime, exploring booster scales and thrust levels beyond current industrial limits. It is a controlled extrapolation for studying mass scaling laws, propulsion clustering, and mission envelopes at extreme scales.

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors