support accessing more fields in mecab node#84
Conversation
|
Thank you for the PR. The code to add the fields looks fine, though there should be tests for it, even trivial ones. I can add them if you're not sure how to. For the BOS/EOS nodes, returning those by default would break existing code that expects them to be removed and is not OK. We can put the functionality behind a parameter that is off by default. |
I'm not sure how to add tests so it would be great if you could demonstrate that:)
I just added a |
|
Apologies for taking so long to get to this, but I've added some tests. I am still not sure about the BOS/EOS thing, especially giving them surfaces, so I'll think about it a little more. |

This pr may resolve #76.
Here's an example:
output: