Skip to content

Add multi-workspace client#19

Open
Karthik-K-N wants to merge 1 commit intoppc64le-cloud:mainfrom
Karthik-K-N:multi-workspace
Open

Add multi-workspace client#19
Karthik-K-N wants to merge 1 commit intoppc64le-cloud:mainfrom
Karthik-K-N:multi-workspace

Conversation

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

This PR adds a mulit-workspace client, Which can be imported in any repositories to perform PowerVS VM search operations across multiple workspaces.

With introduction of cluster-api-provider-ibmcloud supporting mulit-workspace, There is need to change the cloud-provider-powervs to support this feature.

Main use case of multi-workspace client is to use it in cloud-provider-powervs.

[Note: If there is no need to have mulit-worksapce here, will move it privately to cloud-provider-powervs repo)

@ppc64le-cloud-bot
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Karthik-K-N
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign mkumatag for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@ppc64le-cloud-bot ppc64le-cloud-bot added the size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files. label Jun 16, 2025
@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

/cc @mkumatag @anshuman-agarwala

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

This PR is ready for review.

Example reference on its usage in cloud-provider-powervs: openshift/cloud-provider-powervs@main...Karthik-K-N:cloud-provider-powervs:multi-workspace-support

@mkumatag
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

mkumatag commented May 5, 2026

@Karthik-K-N @kishen-v do we need this?

@Karthik-K-N
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

@Karthik-K-N @kishen-v do we need this?

Yes, If it can be reviewed its good to have. But not urgent at the moment

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

size/XL Denotes a PR that changes 500-999 lines, ignoring generated files.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants