Add Nix package for PyQGIS API Documentation builder#209
Conversation
|
Can you help me understand what the use case is here? Currently all the documentation is built using github workflows, so there's really no need for this to be packaged for use elsewhere. |
4df81ef to
d765424
Compare
f9d0e1f to
535ea32
Compare
|
Hi @nyalldawson We are in the process of deploying new infrastructure with NixOS used for provisioning all the servers (including API docs and general documentation). Having this patch applied is important to us because the documentation needs to be built as a package and then deployed in order to be consistent with the methodology we are using for server deployments. All the packages will be discrete, repeatable deployments stored in cachix which is a cache platform for Nix packages. There may be more nix related patches coming, would be grateful if we can incorporate this work. If you want more details we would be happy to hop into a call with you to explain a bit better the process we are following. @imincik is a seasoned and well respected Nix contributor, leading the effort to make geospatial tools available on Nix (including packaging QGIS on Nix) and has been contracted by the PSC (as well as contributing his own time as a volunteer) to help with our next gen infrastructure roll out that @Xpirix and I have been working on. Regards Tim |
|
@timlinux In regards to this PR -- is there any way to move these files into a subfolder? I really dislike having packaging related files cluttering up the root folder of a repository. |
|
|
For the record, Nix packaging in QGIS repos was discussed during video call with @nyalldawson , @timlinux , @Xpirix and @imincik . |
56172af to
2e9bc31
Compare
|
Documentation build is failing on following error after rebase on to the latest master of pyqgis-api-docs-builder This didn't happen before. Any ideas ? |
|
Fails on The same command runs without problem in QGIS interactive Python console. |
|
With build fails on |
|
Probably related to this change 2ca3643 |
4e75484 to
a1599f1
Compare
|
Issues where fixed in a1599f1 . This change needs cleanup and should be squashed. |
WIP: Fix screenshots creation
a1599f1 to
a02989b
Compare
|
@nyalldawson , @timlinux PR is good to be merged now. |
|
@imincik what's the status here? shall we merge this? |
|
closing, feel free to reopen. |
|
@3nids , yes we definitely need to merge this PR. Sorry for late reply. Would you please re-open ? Thanks. |
No description provided.