Skip to content

Conversation

@thedavidmeister
Copy link
Contributor

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister commented Jan 19, 2026

Motivation

Solution

Checks

By submitting this for review, I'm confirming I've done the following:

  • made this PR as small as possible
  • unit-tested any new functionality
  • linked any relevant issues or PRs
  • included screenshots (if this involves a front-end change)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Tests
    • Renamed and reorganized ctpop-related tests for clearer naming and expanded coverage, adding edge-case and small-input checks and additional consistency assertions.
  • Chores
    • Updated gas snapshot entries to reflect the new test metrics and replaced previous CTPOP snapshots with the revised CtPop values.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 19, 2026

Walkthrough

Replaces CTPOP gas-snapshot entries with CtPop variants and renames/adds test functions in the LibCtPop test file; new edge-case tests and assertions comparing ctpop to a slow reference were added. Changes include snapshot data edits and test API renames/additions.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Gas Snapshot Data
.gas-snapshot
Replaced three CTPOP entries with six CtPop entries; updated gas values and μ/~ metrics (data-only modifications).
LibCtPop Tests
test/src/lib/LibCtPop.ctpop.t.sol
Renamed public test functions from testCTPOP* to testCtPop*; added three new public tests (testCtPop256EdgeCase, testCtPop0, testCtPop1); extended existing tests to assert ctpop equals ctpopSlow/ctSlow.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 2 | ❌ 1
❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'snapshot' is extremely vague and generic. While the PR updates snapshot files, the title fails to convey the meaningful context of renaming test functions, adding edge-case tests, and refactoring CTPOP-related test nomenclature. Use a more descriptive title that captures the main changes, such as 'Rename CTPOP tests to CtPop and add edge case coverage' to clearly communicate the primary purpose of the changeset.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@thedavidmeister thedavidmeister merged commit c7ebb6c into main Jan 19, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants