Clarify scope vs process in Hierarchy of Truth - #2
Conversation
Keep product scope in the PRD, process law in the constitution, and story maps as a human planning aid outside Gate 2. Co-authored-by: Rik Dryfoos <rdryfoos@users.noreply.github.com>
|
Caution Review failedThe pull request is closed. ℹ️ Recent review info⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: defaults Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (4)
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughDocumentation updates clarify that product scope comes from ChangesGovernance documentation alignment
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~3 minutes ✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
|



Makes the constitution/PRD split explicit so agents don’t invent product scope from process docs.
Changes
CLAUDE.md— one-liner for cold agentstraceability.md— Gate 2 proves the PRD is true of the system, not that it’s the right productREADME.md— Story Map reframed as a human planning aid; PRD listed first as authoritative scopeNo product requirements or Gate 2 behavior changes.
Summary by CodeRabbit