example-app: tighten the offline-sync reconnect budget to 2s - #4
Conversation
Product tightened the sync SLA: a change made offline should now appear on a second device within 2s of reconnect, down from 5s. Restates the AC-SYNC-01 acceptance criterion in the PRD. This is a demo PR for the Thread Report's Intent Changed section: the intent's wording moved, but the proof (test_AC_SYNC_01) still asserts the old budget — so the report should flag the criterion for re-confirmation without breaking the Golden Thread. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_01TM5e4tKiqCUNANBCkTtH2r
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughThe PRD updates ChangesSynchronization requirement
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🧵 Thread Report🟢 Golden Thread intact What movedNo status changes in this PR. Intent Changed
Thread StatusSYNC
+2 untouched backlog rows not shown. Off ThreadEvery changed file carries a mark tying it to an intent. Nothing sits off the thread. Thread Report illuminates; it does not refuse. "Off thread" is a visibility call, not a gate. Set |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@examples/example-app/PRD.md`:
- Line 14: Align the sync timing threshold with the 2-second requirement from
AC-SYNC-01 by updating the corresponding acceptance expectation in sync/spec.md
and the enforcement in test_sync.py, replacing the existing 5-second limit while
preserving the rest of the sync behavior.
🪄 Autofix
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
ℹ️ Review info
⚙️ Run configuration
Configuration used: defaults
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro Plus
Run ID: ee92dc5a-4b95-4201-a2e0-d628b97dc876
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
examples/example-app/PRD.md
| - US-SYNC-01 — As a user, I keep my lists in sync across devices. | ||
| - FR-SYNC-01 — Two-way sync reconciles list changes across devices. | ||
| - AC-SYNC-01 — A change made offline appears on a second device within 5s of reconnect. | ||
| - AC-SYNC-01 — A change made offline appears on a second device within 2s of reconnect. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🗄️ Data Integrity & Integration | 🟠 Major | ⚡ Quick win
🧩 Analysis chain
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash
set -eu
printf '%s\n' '--- PRD ---'
sed -n '1,28p' examples/example-app/PRD.md
printf '%s\n' '--- specification ---'
sed -n '1,80p' examples/example-app/specs/sync/spec.md
printf '%s\n' '--- test ---'
sed -n '1,160p' examples/example-app/tests/test_sync.py
printf '%s\n' '--- related acceptance references ---'
rg -n -C 2 'AC-SYNC-01|within 2s|within 5s|elapsed' examples/example-appRepository: rdryfoos/specassay
Length of output: 8386
Align the sync acceptance threshold across artifacts.
If the 2-second threshold is confirmed, update examples/example-app/specs/sync/spec.md and examples/example-app/tests/test_sync.py; both still enforce 5 seconds.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@examples/example-app/PRD.md` at line 14, Align the sync timing threshold with
the 2-second requirement from AC-SYNC-01 by updating the corresponding
acceptance expectation in sync/spec.md and the enforcement in test_sync.py,
replacing the existing 5-second limit while preserving the rest of the sync
behavior.
PR from Intent (wording moves alone - the alarm state, carriers owe a re-confirm) and PR from the Field, the discovery PR (carriers move in the same diff - the pairing is the coherence evidence). Mark the pair shipped with links to the live demos, and document the '<- updated in this PR' carrier annotation in the reference.
What changed
Product tightened the offline-sync SLA. A change made offline should now appear on a second device within 2s of reconnect, down from 5s. This restates the
AC-SYNC-01acceptance criterion in the PRD — one line, the intent's own wording.Why it's here
This is a demo of the Thread Report's Intent Changed section. The ID didn't change — the meaning did. The code and test written against the old 5s wording are now standing behind a criterion that says 2s. The Golden Thread still reads intact (the proof still exists and passes), so nothing is broken — but the report should flag
AC-SYNC-01for re-confirmation and pinpoint thattests/test_sync.pystill asserts the old budget.That's the whole point of the feature: a restatement is illuminated, never blocked. Watch the 🧵 Thread Report comment below for the Intent Changed section.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code
https://claude.ai/code/session_01TM5e4tKiqCUNANBCkTtH2r
Generated by Claude Code
Summary by CodeRabbit