Skip to content

Add config option for Discord setActivity#423

Open
Golumpa wants to merge 2 commits intoreactiflux:mainfrom
Golumpa:discord-activity-status
Open

Add config option for Discord setActivity#423
Golumpa wants to merge 2 commits intoreactiflux:mainfrom
Golumpa:discord-activity-status

Conversation

@Golumpa
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Golumpa Golumpa commented Jul 22, 2018

Another alternative to resolve issue #246

I chose to use the setActivity class as in my opinion, makes more sense for something like this.

@coveralls
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coveralls commented Jul 22, 2018

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.6%) to 97.898% when pulling 0eff2bc on Golumpa:discord-activity-status into b252f56 on reactiflux:master.

Comment thread README.md
"discord": ["discord_nick1", "discord_nick2"] // Ignore specified Discord nicks and do not send their messages to IRC.
},
// Sets the discord activity status, can be set to one of "PLAYING, STREAMING, LISTENING or WATCHING"
"discordStatus": ["PLAYING", "with you!"],
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Maybe it would be more self explantory if this was an object? E.g. something like:

"discordStatus": {
  "name": ...,
  "type": ...,
  "url": ...
}

@Throne3d
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Throne3d commented Aug 8, 2019

I can't tell what's going on between #423, #368 and #359. Are there any plans to change the PR further, and would you be able to add (basic) tests for the functionality? (Is there consensus on a specific implementation?)

I don't care much about the rich presence system, so something that people agree works would be good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants