chore: fail on docs warnings and export missing types#361
Conversation
|
thanks! There are some types that we purposefully didn't export but that we are still using. It would be fine that the docs just wrote those out, so that instead of it would be So the idea was that it would just document those unexported typed as a copy of their definition rather than refer to them by name and then expose a hole bunch of simple/useless names types. It looks like https://github.com/Gerrit0/typedoc-plugin-missing-exports actually does this. Are you familiar with that by any chance? |
|
actually this might still be better. The idea is to keep what the SDK exposes minimal. We still want it to be documented though, so maybe this is a good middle way.. hmm |
roncohen
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
never mind, lets just get this in for now.
d9dd1d4 to
7b2deae
Compare

No description provided.