EPMRPP-113667 || Include appropriate links in the Features articles

[pressayuliya]

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Enhanced feature documentation with improved internal navigation links across guides for better discoverability and user experience.
  • Expanded failure categorization options with two new categories: "System Issue" and "Not a Defect," providing more granular classification for test failures.

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

Documentation files in the docs/features/ directory receive hyperlink enhancements, converting plain text references into markdown links pointing to internal documentation pages and external resources. No content changes; purely navigational improvements across eight feature documentation files.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Multi-Link Documentation Updates docs/features/AIFailureReasonDetection.md, docs/features/TestExecutions.md, docs/features/UnifiedTestReporting.md	Multiple plain text references converted to internal markdown links for improved navigation (3, 2, and 3 links respectively).
Single-Link Documentation Enhancements docs/features/CategorisationOfFailures.md, docs/features/QualityGates.md, docs/features/RichArtifactsInTestReports.md, docs/features/SCIMServerFeature.md, docs/features/VisualisationOfTestResults.md	Individual plain text references wrapped with internal markdown links to improve cross-page navigation and discoverability.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~5 minutes

Possibly related PRs

• Release 25.2 #1044 — Adds the TestExecutions.md page, while this PR updates link references within the same file.

Suggested reviewers

• AmsterGet
• maria-hambardzumian

Poem

🐰 Through docs I hop with eager feet,
Plain text becomes a linked-up treat,
Cross-reference paths, now clear and bright,
Guiding readers left and right!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The pull request title accurately describes the main change: adding hyperlinks to documentation articles in the Features section.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

✨ Finishing Touches

🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)

• Create PR with unit tests
• Commit unit tests in branch EPMRPP-113667

📝 Coding Plan

• Generate coding plan for human review comments

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

Tip

CodeRabbit can enforce grammar and style rules using `languagetool`.

Configure the reviews.tools.languagetool setting to enable/disable rules and categories. Refer to the LanguageTool Community to learn more.

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 1

🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

Inline comments:
In `@docs/features/AIFailureReasonDetection.md`:
- Line 27: The sentence under "ML-Based Suggestions" contains a grammatical typo
("while do manual analysis"); update the wording in the "ML-Based Suggestions"
bullet so it reads cleanly — for example: "Leveraging machine learning
algorithms, this feature provides suggestions for failures that are most similar
to ones you've encountered before while you perform manual analysis." Locate the
"ML-Based Suggestions" entry and replace the faulty phrase "while do manual
analysis" with "while you perform manual analysis" (or an equivalent natural
phrasing) to fix the user-facing documentation.

🪄 Autofix (Beta)

Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:

• Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
• Create a new PR with the fixes

---

ℹ️ Review info

⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

Run ID: 9af360b6-7155-4b45-85d1-6a54a5eb94e4

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 6527ac6 and 44cd06c.

📒 Files selected for processing (8)

• docs/features/AIFailureReasonDetection.md
• docs/features/CategorisationOfFailures.md
• docs/features/QualityGates.md
• docs/features/RichArtifactsInTestReports.md
• docs/features/SCIMServerFeature.md
• docs/features/TestExecutions.md
• docs/features/UnifiedTestReporting.md
• docs/features/VisualisationOfTestResults.md

[coderabbitai]

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Fix grammar in ML suggestions sentence.

Line 27 has a wording issue: “while do manual analysis.” This reads as a typo in user-facing docs.

✏️ Proposed wording fix

-- [**ML-Based Suggestions:**](/analysis/MLSuggestions) Leveraging machine learning algorithms, this feature provides suggestions for failures that are most similar to ones you've encountered before while do manual analysis. The suggestions guide your team in identifying the root causes of test failures more accurately and swiftly.
+- [**ML-Based Suggestions:**](/analysis/MLSuggestions) Leveraging machine learning algorithms, this feature provides suggestions for failures that are most similar to ones you've encountered before while doing manual analysis. The suggestions guide your team in identifying the root causes of test failures more accurately and swiftly.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change

	- [**ML-Based Suggestions:**](/analysis/MLSuggestions) Leveraging machine learning algorithms, this feature provides suggestions for failures that are most similar to ones you've encountered before while do manual analysis. The suggestions guide your team in identifying the root causes of test failures more accurately and swiftly.
	- [**ML-Based Suggestions:**](/analysis/MLSuggestions) Leveraging machine learning algorithms, this feature provides suggestions for failures that are most similar to ones you've encountered before while doing manual analysis. The suggestions guide your team in identifying the root causes of test failures more accurately and swiftly.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents

Verify each finding against the current code and only fix it if needed.

In `@docs/features/AIFailureReasonDetection.md` at line 27, The sentence under
"ML-Based Suggestions" contains a grammatical typo ("while do manual analysis");
update the wording in the "ML-Based Suggestions" bullet so it reads cleanly —
for example: "Leveraging machine learning algorithms, this feature provides
suggestions for failures that are most similar to ones you've encountered before
while you perform manual analysis." Locate the "ML-Based Suggestions" entry and
replace the faulty phrase "while do manual analysis" with "while you perform
manual analysis" (or an equivalent natural phrasing) to fix the user-facing
documentation.