fix: don't allow NaN/Infinity params - #31
Open
ChALkeR wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
Owner
|
Keep in mind that changing I am planning to make a major version change in the near future though, which will allow modern syntax. |
Author
|
@ricmoo I don't understand, sorry. 3.x is already using The only thing that was changed outside of tests in this PR is |
Owner
|
Oh!! Sorry, I just checked and you are correct. I think I confused this with my AES library? I'm planning a major release soon, which will port the library to TypeScript. I'll look into this PR as soon as I can. Thanks! :) |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I believe this is a regression in e55eb39#diff-714a4bf03391301f9f8a3a4b026cd1a82fa422b664209252422963d9548341c6L255-R255, previous versions of scrypt-js correctly rejected NaN input but 3.x doesn't.
Also, perhaps more checks are needed there, e.g. for the number to be non-negative (
>= 0) and<= Number.MAX_SAFE_INTEGER. Wdyt?Tests included.
Without the patch, the lib misbehaves on
NaNandInfinityinput.