Skip to content

Clarify how mhselect[2] is concatenated with mhvalue#1139

Open
Evgeniy Naydanov (en-sc) wants to merge 1 commit into
riscv:mainfrom
en-sc:en-sc/mhselect-concat
Open

Clarify how mhselect[2] is concatenated with mhvalue#1139
Evgeniy Naydanov (en-sc) wants to merge 1 commit into
riscv:mainfrom
en-sc:en-sc/mhselect-concat

Conversation

@en-sc
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Before the patch it was unclear whether mhselect[2] should be compared with the least significant or the most significant bit.

Fixes #1138

Before the patch it was unclear whether `mhselect[2]` should be compared
with the least significant or the most significant bit.

Fixes riscv#1138
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

It's unclear how mhselect[2] is concatenated with mhvalue

1 participant