Complete Phases 3-7: Quality Transformation to Production Standards

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/bug_report.md

@@ -0,0 +1,45 @@
+---
+name: Bug Report
+about: Report a bug or unexpected behavior
+title: '[BUG] '
+labels: bug
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+## Bug Description
+<!-- A clear and concise description of the bug -->
+
+## Steps to Reproduce
+1.
+2.
+3.
+
+## Expected Behavior
+<!-- What you expected to happen -->
+
+## Actual Behavior
+<!-- What actually happened -->
+
+## Environment
+- **OS**: <!-- e.g., Ubuntu 22.04, macOS 14.0, Windows 11 -->
+- **Python Version**: <!-- e.g., 3.10.5 -->
+- **MuJoCo MCP Version**: <!-- e.g., 0.8.2 -->
+- **MuJoCo Version**: <!-- e.g., 3.0.0 -->
+
+## Minimal Reproducible Example
+```python
+# Paste minimal code that reproduces the issue
+```
+
+## Error Messages / Stack Trace
+```
+# Paste full error message and stack trace
+```
+
+## Additional Context
+<!-- Any other relevant information, screenshots, or logs -->
+
+## Checklist
+- [ ] I have searched existing issues to ensure this is not a duplicate
+- [ ] I have provided all requested information above
+- [ ] I have included a minimal reproducible example

.github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/feature_request.md

@@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
+---
+name: Feature Request
+about: Suggest a new feature or enhancement
+title: '[FEATURE] '
+labels: enhancement
+assignees: ''
+---
+
+## Feature Description
+<!-- A clear and concise description of the feature you'd like to see -->
+
+## Motivation
+<!-- Why is this feature needed? What problem does it solve? -->
+
+## Proposed Solution
+<!-- How would you like to see this implemented? -->
+
+## Alternative Solutions
+<!-- Have you considered any alternative approaches? -->
+
+## Use Cases
+<!-- Describe specific scenarios where this feature would be valuable -->
+
+## Additional Context
+<!-- Any other relevant information, mockups, or examples -->
+
+## Checklist
+- [ ] I have searched existing issues to ensure this is not a duplicate
+- [ ] I have clearly described the problem this feature solves
+- [ ] I have considered how this feature aligns with the project's goals

.github/PULL_REQUEST_TEMPLATE.md

@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
+## Description
+<!-- Provide a clear and concise description of your changes -->
+
+## Type of Change
+<!-- Mark the relevant option with an "x" -->
+- [ ] Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
+- [ ] New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
+- [ ] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
+- [ ] Documentation update
+- [ ] Code refactoring
+- [ ] Performance improvement
+- [ ] Test coverage improvement
+
+## Related Issues
+<!-- Link related issues using #issue_number -->
+Fixes #
+Related to #
+
+## Changes Made
+<!-- List the key changes in this PR -->
+-
+-
+-
+
+## Testing
+<!-- Describe the testing you've done -->
+
+### Test Coverage
+- [ ] Unit tests added/updated
+- [ ] Integration tests added/updated
+- [ ] All existing tests pass
+- [ ] Code coverage maintained or improved
+
+### Manual Testing
+<!-- Describe manual testing performed -->
+-
+-
+
+## Code Quality Checklist
+- [ ] Code follows the project's style guidelines (passes `ruff check`)
+- [ ] Code is properly formatted (passes `ruff format --check`)
+- [ ] Type hints are added where appropriate
+- [ ] Docstrings are added/updated for public APIs
+- [ ] No new linting warnings introduced
+- [ ] All tests pass locally (`pytest`)
+- [ ] No decrease in code coverage
+
+## Documentation
+- [ ] README.md updated (if needed)
+- [ ] API documentation updated (if needed)
+- [ ] CHANGELOG.md updated (if needed)
+- [ ] Code comments added for complex logic
+
+## Breaking Changes
+<!-- If this PR includes breaking changes, describe them and the migration path -->
+- N/A
+
+## Screenshots / Demos
+<!-- If applicable, add screenshots or demo videos -->
+
+## Additional Notes
+<!-- Any additional information reviewers should know -->
+
+## Reviewer Checklist
+<!-- For maintainers reviewing this PR -->
+- [ ] Code review completed
+- [ ] Architecture and design reviewed
+- [ ] Security implications considered
+- [ ] Performance implications considered
+- [ ] Documentation is adequate
+- [ ] Tests are comprehensive
+- [ ] Ready to merge