Skip to content

Repository files navigation

TRIBUNAL

License: MIT Go 1.21+ Python 3.11+ TypeScript PostgreSQL 15+ Status: Beta

The Missing Code Review Layer: AI That Reviews What the AI Wrote

The senior engineer that scales. TRIBUNAL detects AI-generated code in your CI/CD pipeline, analyzes semantic context blindness, and generates briefings that reduce code review time from 30 minutes to 30 seconds per change.

The Crisis

Amazon now mandates senior engineer sign-off on every AI-assisted code change. Google and Microsoft have 25%+ of commits from AI tools with zero specialized review process.

Your linters catch syntax errors. They miss semantic catastrophes:

  • The AI writes a database migration that's syntactically perfect but doesn't know the table has 2 billion rows and zero-downtime tolerance
  • The CI/CD change is well-formatted but cascades across 47 dependent services
  • The retry logic is clever but targets a non-idempotent API
  • The config update is organized but breaks two different feature flags

Result: Engineering teams scale AI tool usage faster than they can review it safely. Human review becomes the bottleneck. The crisis intensifies.

The Solution

TRIBUNAL is an automated senior engineer that understands context.

Instead of asking "Is this code correct?", TRIBUNAL asks:

Does this code understand what it's operating on?

How It Works

┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐     ┌──────────────┐
│  PR Created  │────▶│ AI Detection │────▶│   Context    │────▶│     Risk     │
│              │     │ (3 signals)  │     │   Analysis   │     │   Briefing   │
└──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘     └──────────────┘
                                                                       │
                                                                       ▼
                                                             ┌──────────────────┐
                                                             │  Human Reviews   │
                                                             │  in 30 seconds   │
                                                             │  (fully informed)│
                                                             └──────────────────┘

The Three Phases

1. DETECT

  • Identifies AI-generated code via authorship fingerprinting
  • Analyzes 3 signals: style patterns, timing anomalies, common AI markers
  • Zero false positives on human-written code

2. ANALYZE

  • Queries your service topology, incident history, and runbooks
  • Runs Claude-powered semantic analysis on risky sections
  • Identifies context blindness gaps the AI didn't know existed

3. BRIEF

  • Generates a context briefing for the human reviewer
  • Shows: "Here's what the AI didn't know"
  • Includes: service dependencies, scale constraints, incident patterns
  • Result: Reviewer has full context in 30 seconds instead of 30 minutes

Why TRIBUNAL Exists

The Paradox: AI code generation is syntactically impressive but semantically dangerous because it operates without understanding operational context.

The Gap: Traditional code review (linters, static analysis) checks syntax. It doesn't check semantic understanding.

The Bottleneck: Manual expert review catches semantic errors but doesn't scale. You can't hire senior engineers as fast as your junior engineers can use Copilot.

The Solution: An automated system that specializes in the blind spot between perfect syntax and catastrophic semantics.

What TRIBUNAL Catches

Risk Type Example Why It Matters
Scale Blindness Database migration on 2B-row table Zero-downtime requirement violated
Idempotency Blindness Retry logic against non-idempotent API Duplicate transactions in production
Cascade Blindness Config change affecting 47 services Cascading failures across the system
Incident Pattern Blindness Using pattern that caused 3 past incidents Repeating known failure modes
Dependency Blindness Breaking change in widely-used library Silent failures downstream
Race Condition Blindness Concurrent code without synchronization Intermittent production bugs

Real-World Impact

For Amazon

Solves the immediate crisis: "We need senior engineers to review every AI change"

  • Before: 1 senior engineer → 20 PRs/day → 30 min/PR = 10 hours (bottleneck)
  • After: TRIBUNAL pre-reviews → 20 PRs/day → 2 min human review/PR = 40 minutes (scaled)

For Google/Microsoft

Scales AI tool trust across 25%+ of codebase without hiring 500 more senior engineers

  • Enables safe delegation: Junior engineer with Copilot → TRIBUNAL validates → Senior confirms
  • Incident reduction: Catch semantic errors before production

For Any Enterprise

  • 50% faster code reviews on AI-written changes
  • Zero semantic errors reaching production
  • Full compliance trail (what TRIBUNAL found, what human decided)
  • Safe to trust junior engineers with AI tools

Architecture

┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│                    GitHub/GitLab/Gitea                          │
│                     (PR Events)                                 │
└────────────────────────┬────────────────────────────────────────┘
                         │
                         ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │   GO: PR Interceptor & Detector    │
        │   • Webhook listener               │
        │   • Extract changed files          │
        │   • 3-signal AI authorship detect  │
        │   • ~2ms per file                  │
        └────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │  GO: Context Graph Builder         │
        │  • Query service topology          │
        │  • Load incident history           │
        │  • Map dependency graph            │
        │  • ~100ms for full context         │
        └────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │   PostgreSQL: Context Layer        │
        │   • Service topology               │
        │   • Incident-to-code correlations  │
        │   • Scale constraints              │
        │   • API documentation              │
        └────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │  Python: Semantic Analyzer         │
        │  • Claude API integration          │
        │  • Context blindness detection     │
        │  • Risk classification             │
        │  • ~5s per high-risk section       │
        └────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │  Python: Briefing Generator        │
        │  • Create human-readable docs      │
        │  • Risk scores + recommendations   │
        │  • Evidence + incident links       │
        └────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │  TypeScript: PR Overlay UI         │
        │  • GitHub check runs               │
        │  • Inline code annotations         │
        │  • Context briefing display        │
        │  • Risk heatmap visualization      │
        └────────┬───────────────────────────┘
                 │
                 ▼
        ┌────────────────────────────────────┐
        │   PR Review Complete               │
        │   Human now has full context       │
        └────────────────────────────────────┘

Technology Stack

Layer Technology Why
PR Interceptor Go 1.21+ Fast (2ms per file), concurrent webhooks, cloud-native
Authorship Detector Go Real-time analysis, pattern matching at scale
Context Builder Go Graph traversal, dependency resolution, in-memory caching
Semantic Analyzer Python 3.11+ Claude API integration, LLM orchestration, risk classification
Briefing Generator Python Template rendering, markdown generation, evidence linking
PR UI Overlay TypeScript + React GitHub/GitLab/Gitea APIs, inline annotations, real-time updates
Data Layer PostgreSQL 15+ Persistent graph storage, incident correlations, audit trail

Quick Start (Docker - Recommended)

The absolute fastest way to boot TRIBUNAL is using our docker-compose orchestration. It automatically wires up the Go Interceptor service and initializes the PostgreSQL database schema for you.

Prerequisites

  • Docker Engine & Docker Compose

1-Click Launch

  1. Clone the repository:

    git clone https://github.com/rohanpatel2002/tribunal.git
    cd tribunal
  2. Boot the cluster in detached mode:

    docker-compose up -d --build
  3. Verify the Go Webhook Engine. Your service is now live on localhost:8080. You can verify it by hitting the health endpoint:

    curl -s http://localhost:8080/health
    # Expected: {"service":"go-interceptor","status":"ok"}
  4. Access the CTO Audit Dashboard. Your premium Next.js UI is now hosted on localhost:3000.

    • Open http://localhost:3000 in your browser.
    • Use the sample Enterprise API Key: dev_enterprise_key_123 to query the seeded demo database!

Stopping the Cluster

To gracefully stop the application while preserving your database volumes:

docker-compose down

Local Setup (Direct Source)

If you are developing locally without Docker, follow these steps:

Prerequisites

  • Go 1.25+
  • PostgreSQL 15+

Source Setup

# Clone repository
git clone https://github.com/rohanpatel2002/tribunal.git
cd tribunal

# Start PostgreSQL natively
docker run -d -p 5432:5432 --name tribunal_native_db \
  -e POSTGRES_USER=tribunal \
  -e POSTGRES_PASSWORD=tribunal_password_dev \
  -e POSTGRES_DB=tribunal_db \
  postgres:15-alpine

# Wait 5 seconds for PostgreSQL to initialize
sleep 5

# Initialize database schema
docker exec -i tribunal_native_db psql -U tribunal -d tribunal_db < schema/postgres.sql

# Start Go service (Pointed at your native database)
cd services/go-interceptor
go mod download
export DATABASE_URL=postgres://tribunal:tribunal_password_dev@localhost:5432/tribunal_db?sslmode=disable
go run main.go

Services will be available at:

  • Go Interceptor: http://localhost:8080

First Test

  1. Ensure the server is running on 8080
  2. Send a simulated webhook payload to the active API:
    curl -s -X POST http://localhost:8080/analyze \
         -H "Content-Type: application/json" \
         --data-binary @services/go-interceptor/fixtures/analyze-high-risk.json
  3. See deterministic AI threat output predicting zero-downtime tolerance violations.

Use Cases

🏗️ Database Migrations

Catch: Scale blindness (2B-row tables, downtime tolerance)

Migration detected
├─ Table size: 2,147,483,647 rows
├─ Tolerance: Zero-downtime required (HA constraint)
├─ AI approach: ADD COLUMN (locks table)
└─ ⚠️ RISK: 4-hour table lock on table serving 50k req/s

🔗 API Integrations

Catch: Idempotency blindness, retry logic errors

Retry logic detected
├─ Target: PaymentService.charge() [NON-IDEMPOTENT]
├─ Pattern: Simple exponential backoff
├─ Risk: Duplicate charges if service times out
└─ ⚠️ CRITICAL: Calls payment API without idempotency key

⚙️ Infrastructure-as-Code

Catch: Cascade effects, config dependencies

Config change detected
├─ Flag: FEATURE_NEW_AUTH
├─ Scope: 47 dependent services
├─ Incident history: 2 outages from similar changes
├─ AI approach: Simple feature flag flip
└─ ⚠️ WARNING: No gradual rollout, no rollback plan

🔄 Distributed Systems

Catch: Race conditions, concurrency blindness

Concurrent code detected
├─ Shared resource: Redis cache
├─ Lock mechanism: None
├─ Pattern: Check-then-set (non-atomic)
└─ ⚠️ RACE CONDITION: Cache invalidation race window

Status

🚧 Early Development — Q1 2026

Component Status Timeline
Go PR Interceptor 🔨 In Progress Early April
AI Authorship Detector 🔨 In Progress Mid April
Python Analyzer 🔨 In Progress Late April
PostgreSQL Schema ✅ Complete Now
TypeScript UI 🔨 In Progress Early May
GitHub Integration 🔨 In Progress Mid May
Beta Release ⏳ Planned Q2 2026

Roadmap

Q2 2026: Beta

  • GitHub integration (first public release)
  • Core semantic analysis
  • Basic context briefing
  • Risk scoring system

Q3 2026: Expansion

  • GitLab full support
  • Gitea integration
  • Custom rule engine
  • Team dashboard

Q4 2026: Intelligence

  • Incident pattern correlation
  • Auto-remediation suggestions
  • Historical trend analysis
  • Custom model fine-tuning

Contributing

We're in active development with a focused roadmap. See CONTRIBUTING.md for how to get involved.

Ways to Contribute

  1. Share Context Blindness Cases — Real examples from your work
  2. Report Issues — Bugs, edge cases, improvements
  3. Request Features — Detection methods, briefing formats
  4. Join Beta Program — Be first to use TRIBUNAL in production

Why This Matters

The era of safe-at-scale AI code generation doesn't exist yet. TRIBUNAL is building it.

As AI code generation becomes standard (not exceptional), the bottleneck shifts from "can we write code fast" to "can we review code safely." The company that solves this problem unlocks the next era of engineering productivity.

TRIBUNAL is that solution.

License

MIT License — See LICENSE for details

Permission granted to use, modify, and distribute TRIBUNAL freely.

Who This Is For

  • Engineering VPs losing sleep over AI-generated code in production
  • Platform teams managing GitHub Copilot at scale
  • Security teams concerned about semantic vulnerabilities
  • DevOps teams reviewing infrastructure-as-code changes
  • Any team where AI-assisted development is outpacing code review capacity

Get Started

Star this repo to follow development 📧 Watch for updates — Beta opens Q2 2026 💬 Open an issue — Share your context blindness stories


The Missing Code Review Layer. Made for every engineering VP reading incident reports written by AI.

Built with ❤️ for the engineers writing the next generation of software.

About

The Missing Code Review Layer: AI That Reviews What the AI Wrote. Detects AI generated code in PRs, analyzes semantic context blindness, and generates briefings for human reviewers. Reduces review time from 30 minutes to 30 seconds per change.

Resources

Stars

0 stars

Watchers

0 watching

Forks

Releases

Packages

Contributors

Languages