Added additional msgpack data types for rs.io.read_dials_stills

[LuisA92]

I encountered errors when usingrs.io.read_dials_stills(extra_cols=['bbox', 'entering']). The issue is resolved by adding additional data types for the problematic columns.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 86.78%. Comparing base (3621f28) to head (89f776b).

Additional details and impacted files

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #326   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   86.78%   86.78%           
=======================================
  Files          40       40           
  Lines        2837     2837           
=======================================
  Hits         2462     2462           
  Misses        375      375           

Flag	Coverage Δ
unittests	86.78% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[kmdalton]

This looks innocuous to me, but I'd like to ask @dermen to have a look before merging. Thanks, @LuisA92

[JBGreisman]

seems reasonable to me too. Once @dermen approves, looks like a good fix to improve coverage of different dials outputs

[LuisA92]

For reference, the following columns from an integrated.refl work with the additional data types:

extra_cols = [
'background.mean',
 'background.sum.value',
 'background.sum.variance',
 'bbox',
 'd',
 'entering',
 'flags',
 'id',
 'imageset_id',
 'intensity.prf.value',
 'intensity.prf.variance',
 'intensity.sum.value',
 'intensity.sum.variance',
 'lp',
 'miller_index',
 'num_pixels.background',
 'num_pixels.background_used',
 'num_pixels.foreground',
 'num_pixels.valid',
 'panel',
 'partial_id',
 'partiality',
 'profile.correlation',
 'qe',
 'refl_ids',
 's1',
 'xyzcal.mm',
 'xyzcal.px',
 'xyzobs.mm.value',
 'xyzobs.mm.variance',
 'xyzobs.px.value',
 'xyzobs.px.variance',
 'zeta',
 ]

[kmdalton]

it's probably okay to merge this if we can't raise @dermen. it don't think it should break any of his workflows.

[kmdalton]

this is a sensible extension that enables new machine learning applications.

[kmdalton]

@LuisA92 -- I think you should feel free to merge this if you're confident in it. It looks good / safe to me.