Merged
Conversation
Contributor
Author
|
CC @hsbt since you worked on ruby-lang.org’s new design 🙏🏻 |
Member
|
@hmdne Do you have any opinion about this? |
hmdne
reviewed
Dec 24, 2025
Collaborator
|
Other than that, LGTM! |
Member
|
👍 |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
These new changes are here to match the ruby-lang.org 2025 redesign, built on top of the previous redesign I did 4 years ago.
Going from ruby-lang.org to try.ruby-lang.org should feel much more cohesive after this, especially since ruby-lang.org links directly to it on the homepage.
Before:
After: