Skip to content

GHSA SYNC: 1 new advisory; 2 modified advisories - #990

Merged
postmodern merged 3 commits into
rubysec:masterfrom
jasnow:ghsa-syncbot-2026-02-08-10_28_16
Feb 12, 2026
Merged

GHSA SYNC: 1 new advisory; 2 modified advisories#990
postmodern merged 3 commits into
rubysec:masterfrom
jasnow:ghsa-syncbot-2026-02-08-10_28_16

Conversation

@jasnow

@jasnow jasnow commented Feb 8, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

GHSA SYNC: 1 new advisory; 2 modified advisories

@postmodern postmodern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If we want to indicate that a CVE is related to another CVE, related: cve: is already supported.

related:
  cve:
    - CVE-....
  url:
    - ...

Comment thread rubies/jruby/CVE-2011-4838.yml Outdated
Comment thread rubies/ruby/CVE-2011-4815.yml Outdated

@postmodern postmodern left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Should rubies/jruby/CVE-2011-4838.yml and rubies/ruby/CVE-2011-4815.yml also get related: cve: like the rubies/jruby/CVE-2019-16254.yml file? I am OK with merging this in it's current state.

@jasnow

jasnow commented Feb 12, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member Author

Should rubies/jruby/CVE-2011-4838.yml and rubies/ruby/CVE-2011-4815.yml also get related: cve: like the rubies/jruby/CVE-2019-16254.yml file? I am OK with merging this in it's current state.

My vote is keep them because it keeps the information separate.
I will be glad to move the URL:/CVE: line up to URL and notes: to description: field.

@postmodern
postmodern merged commit c5823cf into rubysec:master Feb 12, 2026
1 check passed
@postmodern

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Should rubies/jruby/CVE-2011-4838.yml and rubies/ruby/CVE-2011-4815.yml also get related: cve: like the rubies/jruby/CVE-2019-16254.yml file? I am OK with merging this in it's current state.

My vote is keep them because it keeps the information separate. I will be glad to move the URL:/CVE: line up to URL and notes: to description: field.

Agreed. Let us use related: cve: for when the same bundled gem in Ruby's stdlib has to be updated in both Ruby and JRuby due to a vulnerability.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants