Strictly enforce pointer validity even for zero-sized accesses#446
Merged
RalfJung merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom Sep 17, 2018
Merged
Strictly enforce pointer validity even for zero-sized accesses#446RalfJung merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
RalfJung merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
bors
added a commit
to rust-lang/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 16, 2018
fix some uses of pointer intrinsics with invalid pointers [Found by miri](rust-lang/miri#446): * `Vec::into_iter` calls `ptr::read` (and the underlying `copy_nonoverlapping`) with an unaligned pointer to a ZST. [According to LLVM devs](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38583), this is UB because it contradicts the metadata we are attaching to that pointer. * `HashMap` creation calls `ptr:.write_bytes` on a NULL pointer with a count of 0. This is likely not currently UB *currently*, but it violates the rules we are setting in #53783, and we might want to exploit those rules later (e.g. with more `nonnull` attributes for LLVM). Probably what `HashMap` really should do is use `NonNull::dangling()` instead of 0 for the empty case, but that would require a more careful analysis of the code. It seems like ideally, we should do a review of usage of such intrinsics all over libstd to ensure that they use valid pointers even when the size is 0. Is it worth opening an issue for that?
cuviper
pushed a commit
to cuviper/rayon-hash
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 15, 2018
fix some uses of pointer intrinsics with invalid pointers [Found by miri](rust-lang/miri#446): * `Vec::into_iter` calls `ptr::read` (and the underlying `copy_nonoverlapping`) with an unaligned pointer to a ZST. [According to LLVM devs](https://bugs.llvm.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38583), this is UB because it contradicts the metadata we are attaching to that pointer. * `HashMap` creation calls `ptr:.write_bytes` on a NULL pointer with a count of 0. This is likely not currently UB *currently*, but it violates the rules we are setting in rust-lang/rust#53783, and we might want to exploit those rules later (e.g. with more `nonnull` attributes for LLVM). Probably what `HashMap` really should do is use `NonNull::dangling()` instead of 0 for the empty case, but that would require a more careful analysis of the code. It seems like ideally, we should do a review of usage of such intrinsics all over libstd to ensure that they use valid pointers even when the size is 0. Is it worth opening an issue for that?
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Waiting for rust-lang/rust#53804 to land.
Fixes #433