feat(search_is_some): Fix when the closure spans multiple lines#15902
Merged
Jarcho merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom Oct 28, 2025
Merged
feat(search_is_some): Fix when the closure spans multiple lines#15902Jarcho merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Jarcho merged 1 commit intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
qmwrygdxpzc
force-pushed
the
search-is-some-fix
branch
from
3f4a6b5 to
63c6e2a
Compare
Previously the program only fixed the code when the closure supplied to the method contained only 1 line. This patch removes the restriction. The code already works. This patch only removes the extra check that causes the restriction. The test cases that can now be fixed are moved into the files containing tests cases that can be fixed. The unnecessary check has survived in the code this way. - In Dec 2015, patch a6bd2d0, pull request 524. The lint was first added. The program did not support fixing code automatically yet. So the suggested fix was printed as a part of the diagnostic message. When the original code contained multiple lines, the suggested fix was omitted in order to keep the diagnostic message concise. - In May 2019, patch bd0b75f, pull request 4049. Logic was added to strip the reference in the closure when the suggested replacement method required it. Because the fix was still only printed when the code contained a single line, the new transformation was only done when the code contained a single line. - In Aug 2019, patch 945d4cf, pull request 4454. The lint was updated to fix code automatically. Because the fixed code had only been printed in the diagnostic message for a single line, the fix was only added for a single line. - In Nov 2021, patch 092fe20, pull request 7463. The logic for transforming the closure was moved into another file. A comment was added saying that it was only good for a single line because it had only been used for a single line. changelog: [`search_is_some`] now fixes code spanning multiple lines
qmwrygdxpzc
force-pushed
the
search-is-some-fix
branch
from
63c6e2a to
622a77d
Compare
Collaborator
|
This PR was rebased onto a different master commit. Here's a range-diff highlighting what actually changed. Rebasing is a normal part of keeping PRs up to date, so no action is needed—this note is just to help reviewers. |
Jarcho
approved these changes
Oct 28, 2025
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously the program only fixed the code when the closure supplied to the method contained only 1 line. This patch removes the restriction.
The code already works. This patch only removes the extra check that causes the restriction. The test cases that can now be fixed are moved into the files containing tests cases that can be fixed.
The unnecessary check has survived in the code this way.
In Dec 2015, patch a6bd2d0, pull request Iterator suggestions #524. The lint was first added. The program did not support fixing code automatically yet. So the suggested fix was printed as a part of the diagnostic message. When the original code contained multiple lines, the suggested fix was omitted in order to keep the diagnostic message concise.
In May 2019, patch bd0b75f, pull request Fix #4033 search_is_some #4049. Logic was added to strip the reference in the closure when the suggested replacement method required it. Because the fix was still only printed when the code contained a single line, the new transformation was only done when the code contained a single line.
In Aug 2019, patch 945d4cf, pull request Dereference one less on search_is_some and make it auto-fixable #4454. The lint was updated to fix code automatically. Because the fixed code had only been printed in the diagnostic message for a single line, the fix was only added for a single line.
In Nov 2021, patch 092fe20, pull request Fix
any()not taking reference insearch_is_somelint #7463. The logic for transforming the closure was moved into another file. A comment was added saying that it was only good for a single line because it had only been used for a single line.changelog: [
search_is_some] now fixes code spanning multiple lines