Conversation
|
r? @flip1995 (rust-highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
flip1995
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks, just a small code-style NIT. r=me with that fixed.
ccf9bd2 to
ab3101a
Compare
|
@bors r+ Thanks! |
|
📌 Commit ab3101a has been approved by |
Fix `explicit_into_iter_loop` fixes: #6900 changelog: Only lint when `into_iter` is an implementation of `IntoIterator`
|
💥 Test timed out |
|
No idea what went wrong there. Spurious failure? |
|
Bors had some problems today. It seems to be up in running again we could at least merge some other PRs with a retry. So somebody just has to queue this PR again. I'll ask in the Clippy Zulip if a member could do that 🙃 |
|
I'm back from my easter slumber! 🐇 🥚 @bors retry |
|
🔒 Merge conflict This pull request and the master branch diverged in a way that cannot be automatically merged. Please rebase on top of the latest master branch, and let the reviewer approve again. How do I rebase?Assuming
You may also read Git Rebasing to Resolve Conflicts by Drew Blessing for a short tutorial. Please avoid the "Resolve conflicts" button on GitHub. It uses Sometimes step 4 will complete without asking for resolution. This is usually due to difference between how Error message |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #6931) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Only lint when `into_iter` is an implementation of `IntoIterator` Minor cleanups
ab3101a to
6b5778e
Compare
|
@bors r+ Now it should work. |
|
📌 Commit 6b5778e has been approved by |
|
☀️ Test successful - checks-action_dev_test, checks-action_remark_test, checks-action_test |
fixes: #6900
changelog: Only lint when
into_iteris an implementation ofIntoIterator