crates.io: remove outdated ops info#1059
Merged
Merged
Conversation
We have this encoded in the crates.io ops guide, along with much more, so this is duplicative and out of date. I've also restructured the index page to look more like the docs.rs page, but I'm also open to the idea that we should just remove it altogether.
rustbot
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
Collaborator
|
Thanks for the pull request, and welcome! The Rust team is excited to review your changes, and you should hear from @Turbo87 (or someone else) some time within the next two weeks. |
rustbot
removed
the
S-waiting-on-review
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
3 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
We have this encoded in the crates.io ops guide, along with much more, so this is duplicative and out of date.
I've also restructured the index page to look more like the docs.rs page, but I'm also open to the idea that we should just remove it altogether.
r? @Turbo87
Rendered