Fix lockfile update script

[clubby789]

Fixes #151354 (comment)

Now passes shellcheck

cc @ehuss

[rustbot]

r? @Mark-Simulacrum

rustbot has assigned @Mark-Simulacrum.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

[Mark-Simulacrum]

@bors r+

[rust-bors]

📌 Commit 8ff928e has been approved by Mark-Simulacrum

It is now in the queue for this repository.

[rust-bors]

☀️ Test successful - CI
Approved by: Mark-Simulacrum
Duration: 3h 17m 28s
Pushing a293cc4 to main...

[github-actions]

What is this?

This is an experimental post-merge analysis report that shows differences in test outcomes between the merged PR and its parent PR.

Comparing 36e2b8a (parent) -> a293cc4 (this PR)

Test differences

Show 3 test diffs

3 doctest diffs were found. These are ignored, as they are noisy.

Test dashboard

Run

cargo run --manifest-path src/ci/citool/Cargo.toml -- \
    test-dashboard a293cc4af8b26701c42738381c0c6f9d2ba881e0 --output-dir test-dashboard

And then open test-dashboard/index.html in your browser to see an overview of all executed tests.

Job duration changes

1. dist-apple-various: 4546.4s -> 3516.5s (-22.7%)
2. x86_64-gnu-miri: 4804.7s -> 4004.9s (-16.6%)
3. x86_64-rust-for-linux: 3090.2s -> 2668.7s (-13.6%)
4. pr-check-1: 1937.0s -> 1678.6s (-13.3%)
5. dist-x86_64-apple: 8890.9s -> 7783.0s (-12.5%)
6. dist-aarch64-llvm-mingw: 5715.8s -> 6420.8s (+12.3%)
7. i686-gnu-2: 6113.5s -> 5363.5s (-12.3%)
8. dist-aarch64-apple: 7588.6s -> 6678.8s (-12.0%)
9. aarch64-apple: 10324.3s -> 11438.4s (+10.8%)
10. x86_64-gnu-llvm-21-2: 5799.6s -> 5208.5s (-10.2%)

How to interpret the job duration changes?

Job durations can vary a lot, based on the actual runner instance
that executed the job, system noise, invalidated caches, etc. The table above is provided
mostly for t-infra members, for simpler debugging of potential CI slow-downs.

[rust-timer]

Finished benchmarking commit (a293cc4): comparison URL.

Overall result: no relevant changes - no action needed

@rustbot label: -perf-regression

Instruction count

This benchmark run did not return any relevant results for this metric.

Max RSS (memory usage)

Results (secondary -2.7%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-2.7%	[-2.7%, -2.7%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Cycles

Results (secondary -3.2%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-3.2%	[-3.2%, -3.2%]	1
All ❌✅ (primary)	-	-	0

Binary size

Results (primary -0.0%, secondary -0.1%)

A less reliable metric. May be of interest, but not used to determine the overall result above.

	mean	range	count
Regressions ❌ (primary)	-	-	0
Regressions ❌ (secondary)	-	-	0
Improvements ✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	22
Improvements ✅ (secondary)	-0.1%	[-0.1%, -0.0%]	5
All ❌✅ (primary)	-0.0%	[-0.0%, -0.0%]	22

Bootstrap: 473.793s -> 473.657s (-0.03%)
Artifact size: 397.77 MiB -> 397.74 MiB (-0.01%)