compiler: ops::RangeInclusive → range::RangeInclusive#157139
Merged
Conversation
The type's been stable for over 6 weeks now, so let's use it! It's better for cases like this one where it's stored in a data structure. Probably won't be materially faster, but does make the variant slightly smaller and lets some more things be `Copy`.
Collaborator
rustbot
added
A-LLVM
oli-obk
approved these changes
May 30, 2026
Contributor
rust-bors
Bot
added
S-waiting-on-bors
rust-bors Bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2026
…uwer Rollup of 12 pull requests Successful merges: - #154591 (Remove `will_cache_on_disk_for_key_fn`) - #156672 (Misc improvements to coroutine transform code) - #157027 (HIR ty lowering: Move some things into submodules) - #157051 (Allow two object files for a single CGU in CompiledModule) - #157100 (Some more per owner things) - #153497 (Use `trait_object_dummy_self` more & heavily fix+update related docs) - #155638 (Fix tupled closure signature in `AsyncFn` arg mismatch diagnostic) - #156826 (style: Clarify nullary call and `()` no-break rule applies past max width) - #157004 (Remove unused functions in `value_analysis.rs`) - #157032 (Fixed more &x ->&mut x suggestions) - #157033 (Note irrefutable while let in loop type errors) - #157139 (compiler: `ops::RangeInclusive` → `range::RangeInclusive`) Failed merges: - #156875 (Correct and document semantics of `yield` terminator)
rust-timer
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 30, 2026
Rollup merge of #157139 - scottmcm:abi-range-inclusive, r=oli-obk compiler: `ops::RangeInclusive` → `range::RangeInclusive` The type's been stable for over 6 weeks now, so let's use it! It's better for cases like this one where it's stored in a data structure. Probably won't be materially faster, but does make the variant slightly smaller and lets some more things be `Copy`. And deletes a whole bunch of parens from things being fields instead of methods 😄 r? compiler
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The type's been stable for over 6 weeks now, so let's use it! It's better for cases like this one where it's stored in a data structure.
Probably won't be materially faster, but does make the variant slightly smaller and lets some more things be
Copy. And deletes a whole bunch of parens from things being fields instead of methods 😄r? compiler