stabilize #[must_use] for functions and must-use comparison operators (RFC 1940)#48925
stabilize #[must_use] for functions and must-use comparison operators (RFC 1940)#48925bors merged 2 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
#[must_use] for functions and must-use comparison operators (RFC 1940)#48925Conversation
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #47813) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
|
No longer blocked. Needs rebase though, ping @zackmdavis =) |
|
Wednesday |
f920bc2 to
442c708
Compare
|
(also left a comment on the tracking issue re whether to error on incorrect attribute placement) |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
442c708 to
d8cbed9
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #50290) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
d8cbed9 to
9d5e08f
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
9d5e08f to
c26ff28
Compare
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
c26ff28 to
4b9b957
Compare
The must-use lint needs the DefId of called functions and method receivers in order to look for a `#[must_use]` attribute, but this would ICE (!) if a called function was actually a closure (with a non-unit return value). Instead, let's be specific that we want a `Def::Fn`, rather than blithely assuming that we can get the DefId of a qpath. Supporting must-use closures doesn't seem like a priority, but could conceivably be added in the future if desired (conditional on the statement and expression attributes (rust-lang#15701) story being amicable).
This is in the matter of RFC 1940 and tracking issue rust-lang#43302.
4b9b957 to
3dbdccc
Compare
|
@nikomatsakis ready |
|
cc @rust-lang/docs -- this PR contains changed that will need to be documented in stable docs. |
|
@bors r+ |
|
📌 Commit 3dbdccc has been approved by |
|
@nikomatsakis: Why not adding it in this PR directly? |
stabilize `#[must_use]` for functions and must-use comparison operators (RFC 1940) r? @nikomatsakis
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
r? @nikomatsakis