Stabilize edition 2018; also updates Clippy, RLS and Cargo#54057
Stabilize edition 2018; also updates Clippy, RLS and Cargo#54057bors merged 4 commits intorust-lang:masterfrom
Conversation
|
|
Urgh, looks like rls needs to be fixed as well.... |
c0dfe1d to
3e56dec
Compare
|
📌 Commit 3e56dec has been approved by |
|
@bors p=5 |
…-clippy, r=alexcrichton Stabilize edition 2018; also updates Clippy and RLS Supersedes rust-lang#53999 Clippy build was failing there because crate_visibility_modifier feature was taken out of edition 2018 and clippy used it. The clippy update enables the corresponding feature explicitly. r? @Mark-Simulacrum
|
⌛ Testing commit 3e56dec with merge 3e3d86293d705ef7e3393b4babcfb292d98b293f... |
|
💔 Test failed - status-appveyor |
|
Looks like rls fails to build..? |
|
@matthiaskrgr I think #53935 needs to be merged first. |
|
@ehuss Hm, why? |
|
RLS requires the update to Cargo (due to rust-lang/rls#1048), and Cargo requires the update to RLS (since RLS is not allowed to be broken). |
|
Uff.... |
3e56dec to
801e613
Compare
|
@ehuss I tried merging the cargo changes of 53953 now. |
|
The job Click to expand the log.I'm a bot! I can only do what humans tell me to, so if this was not helpful or you have suggestions for improvements, please ping or otherwise contact |
(done by matthiaskrgr, but I authored ehuss)
801e613 to
60be068
Compare
👍 hopefully this can get through the queue before tuesday 😄 |
|
@bors r+ p=5 |
|
📌 Commit 60be068 has been approved by |
…Mark-Simulacrum Stabilize edition 2018; also updates Clippy, RLS and Cargo Supersedes #53999 , #53935 Clippy build was failing there because crate_visibility_modifier feature was taken out of edition 2018 and clippy used it. The clippy update enables the corresponding feature explicitly. r? @Mark-Simulacrum
|
☀️ Test successful - status-appveyor, status-travis |
Supersedes #53999 , #53935
Clippy build was failing there because crate_visibility_modifier feature was taken out of edition 2018 and clippy used it.
The clippy update enables the corresponding feature explicitly.
r? @Mark-Simulacrum