Conversation
|
Would it make sense to fail the builds if there are warnings like the ones this PR fixes ? |
|
Thanks for this, these have been bothering me for a while!
I would say yes (can easily be done with |
Where would one do that. There are no CI related files in the winit repo. |
GitHub actions looks in |
|
The wasm builds fail as expected. |
4d19aca to
ee785b2
Compare
|
I am getting spammed by CI messages about unrelated failed checks whenever I push changes to the branch. The failed checks should be disabled until properly fixed ? |
Totally overlooked them ! Thanks. |
|
Please don't disable the failing |
They don't‽ Now that you've mentioned it, the "Squash and merge" button does look awfully clickable.
The notification spam is unfortunate, but I don't know if we can turn those off. |
I don't think we can, though people can control it themselves under Settings => Notifications => Actions. |
|
Ping. |
|
Ah, just a heads up that warnings are not stable. |
|
Well, we run CI on I'm not strictly opposed to pinning our Rust version, though I think it should be for other reasons like guaranteeing a MSRV. |
|
Ah sure, if your paying enough attention to the nightly workflow then that would work too. |
cargo fmthas been run on this branchcargo docbuilds successfullyCHANGELOG.mdif knowledge of this change could be valuable to users