Skip to content

[codex] Mark residual portfolio lane non-default#137

Merged
saagpatel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/portfolio-residue-nondefault
Jul 4, 2026
Merged

[codex] Mark residual portfolio lane non-default#137
saagpatel merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
codex/portfolio-residue-nondefault

Conversation

@saagpatel

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

What

Adds one explicit non-default catalog contract for the final residual portfolio lane.

Why

The portfolio truth queue was otherwise clean, but one settled out-of-scope lane still surfaced as decision-needed because it had no explicit catalog contract.

Review Of What Was Built

  • Added a single catalog entry using existing experimental disposition semantics.
  • Regenerated local portfolio truth and confirmed decision-needed drops to zero.

Cleanup Review

No new code paths or attention states were added. This intentionally uses the existing catalog vocabulary rather than expanding the model.

Verification Summary

  • uv run python -m src.cli report saagpatel --portfolio-truth --portfolio-truth-allow-empty-notion succeeded.
  • jq check confirmed decision-needed is zero.
  • uv run operator-os-seam-linter --truth output/portfolio-truth-latest.json --json passed.
  • uv run pytest -q tests/test_portfolio_catalog.py tests/test_portfolio_pathing.py tests/test_portfolio_truth.py tests/test_weekly_command_center.py passed: 80 passed.
  • uv run ruff check . passed.
  • git diff --check passed.

Shipped Summary

The branch reduces default attention to active product/infra only, with no current decision-needed items in the local truth snapshot.

Next Phase

After merge, fast-forward local main, regenerate portfolio truth once from merged state, and run the seam-linter as the final baseline check.

Remaining Roadmap

  • Keep future portfolio cleanup behind the default-attention contract so settled residue does not become operator work again.

@saagpatel
saagpatel merged commit 86c73a9 into main Jul 4, 2026
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant