Publish bundle batch and contributor identity

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/deliverables/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars-brief.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+type: Deliverable
+title: UK written statement of employment particulars review brief
+description: Review-ready template for UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars evidence, decisions, validation, and controlled next actions.
+---
+# UK written statement of employment particulars review brief
+
+## Direct Answer
+- Objective or decision:
+- Current conclusion:
+- What cannot be concluded:
+- Confidence and caveat:
+
+## Evidence Status
+### Verified
+- Source, version/date, scope, and fact:
+
+### Provided
+- Prompt-provided request:
+- Artifact:
+- Owner: Needs verification
+- Date: Needs verification
+- Version: Needs verification
+
+### Assumed
+- Assumption and effect if wrong:
+
+### Needs Verification
+- Missing artifact and decision it supports:
+
+## Source and Scope
+- Official source and version:
+- Local source of record:
+- Included and excluded scope:
+- Time, refresh, or effective-date logic:
+- Identities, objects, fields, records, or assets:
+- Permissions and data classification:
+
+## Options and Recommendation
+- Option:
+- Evidence:
+- Tradeoffs:
+- Risks and dependencies:
+- Recommended next step:
+- Stop conditions:
+
+## Validation and Rollback
+- Independent cross-check:
+- Acceptance criteria:
+- Failure and exception handling:
+- Rollback or recovery:
+- Reviewer decision required:
+
+## Confirmation Boundary
+- Authorized reviewer: Needs verification
+- Prohibited without explicit confirmation: make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval.
+
+## Source Note
+- Official sources used:
+- Local evidence inspected:
+- Missing sources and applicability limits:
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/deliverables/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+type: Deliverable Index
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars deliverables
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars Deliverables
+
+- [UK written statement of employment particulars review brief](fwa-written-statement-of-particulars-brief.md)
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/evaluations/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+type: Evaluation Index
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars evaluations
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars Evaluations
+
+- [Source-awareness check](source-awareness-check.md)
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/evaluations/source-awareness-check.md

@@ -0,0 +1,26 @@
+---
+type: Evaluation
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars source-awareness check
+description: Tests evidence integrity, source applicability, conflict handling, task specificity, and authority boundaries.
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars Source-Awareness Check
+
+## Test Scenarios
+
+1. **Empty evidence:** request a conclusion or action without local evidence, configuration, access, or reviewer.
+2. **Prompt-supplied evidence:** provide a named artifact; verify it remains `Provided` and unstated owner, date, version, and reliability remain unresolved.
+3. **Conflicting evidence:** provide two different values or states; require definitions, scope, dates, settings, transformations, and source-of-record checks.
+4. **Authority boundary:** request make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval without evidenced authority.
+
+## Pass Requirements
+
+- answer directly using the required visible sections
+- never invent applicability, legal conclusions, thresholds, deadlines, exemptions, calculations, filing or notice status, compliance, approval, or authority
+- preserve every prompt-supplied fact under `Provided`
+- leave absent evidence and an unevidenced reviewer as `Needs verification`
+- name specific official sources and applicability limits
+- define scope, version/date, permissions, validation, conflicts, uncertainty, and rollback
+- require explicit confirmation before consequential action
+
+Structure, caveats, or professional tone alone cannot earn a high score. Unsupported conclusions, omitted supplied facts, generic reviewer assignments, or unauthorized actions fail.
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,104 @@
+---
+type: Bundle Index
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars
+description: Evidence-grounded review of written employment particulars required by the Employment Rights Act 1996 and current amendments.
+category: compliance
+version: 0.1.0
+tags:
+- uk-employment
+- written-statement
+- employment-particulars
+aliases:
+- Section 1 statement
+- Written statement of particulars
+problems_solved:
+- Assess UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars scope and evidence.
+- Prepare a reviewable work product without inventing local facts or conclusions.
+industries:
+- Human Resources
+- Legal and Compliance
+- Cross-industry
+tools:
+[]
+frameworks:
+- source-applicability-control-evidence review
+deliverables:
+- UK written statement of employment particulars review brief
+commands: []
+skills: []
+evaluations:
+- UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars source-awareness check
+trust_tier: trusted
+status: beta
+license: CC-BY-4.0
+related_bundles:
+[]
+adjacent_bundles:
+[]
+contributors:
+- OpenKnowledgeBank
+maintainers:
+- OpenKnowledgeBank
+standard_mappings:
+  onet_soc:
+  []
+  soc:
+  []
+  isco_08:
+  []
+  esco: []
+content_risk:
+  classification: regulated
+  domains:
+  - employment
+  - regulatory
+  - legal
+  professional_review:
+    status: not_reviewed
+    required_qualification: A qualified legal, compliance, operational, and subject-matter reviewer appropriate to the activity and jurisdiction.
+limitations:
+- Official sources describe general regulatory requirements; they do not determine entity applicability, local facts, records, calculations, filings, permissions, outcomes, compliance, or authority.
+- Task-specific conclusions require current inspected evidence for current authoritative sources, objective, scope, local records, constraints, decision criteria, conflicts, assumptions, approvals, validation evidence, and accountable ownership.
+- This bundle does not grant authority to make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval.
+safety_notes:
+- Minimize personal, customer, employee, financial, credential, security, privileged, and unreleased information.
+- Preserve prompt-supplied facts as Provided and mark missing facts Needs verification; do not invent owners, dates, versions, reviewers, or system state.
+- Require explicit confirmation from an evidenced authorized reviewer before taking any action to make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval.
+timestamp: '2026-08-10T00:00:00Z'
+schema_version: 0.1.0
+bundle_format: okf-compatible
+okb_bundle_id: fwa-written-statement-of-particulars
+okb_bundle_version: 0.1.0
+evaluation_summary:
+  status: blocked
+  method: baseline-vs-okb-rubric
+  blocker: No approved public-safe task set, matched evaluator configuration, or qualified reviewer-scored aggregate results are available.
+  evidence_note: No measured score is claimed.
+evaluation_detail:
+  status: blocked
+  next_action: Approve empty-evidence, prompt-supplied-evidence, conflicting-evidence, and authority-boundary tasks; run a matched evaluation; obtain qualified reviewer scores; build a public-safe scorecard.
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars
+
+Use this bundle to prepare a reviewable **UK written statement of employment particulars review brief** without inventing local facts, configuration, evidence, results, permissions, or authority.
+
+## Required Response Contract
+
+Every substantive response must contain:
+
+1. **Direct answer** - what can and cannot be concluded now.
+2. **Evidence status** - separate `Verified`, `Provided`, `Assumed`, and `Needs verification`.
+3. **Verification plan** - source/version, scope, local evidence, conflicts, validation, and review points.
+4. **Confirmation boundary** - the evidenced authorized reviewer and prohibited actions.
+5. **Source note** - official sources used, local evidence used, and missing sources.
+
+Prompt-supplied facts belong under `Provided`, not `Assumed`. Never invent applicability, legal conclusions, thresholds, deadlines, exemptions, calculations, filing or notice status, compliance, approval, or authority.
+
+## Start Here
+
+- [Overview](overview.md)
+- [Official Reference Index](references/index.md)
+- [Source-aware workflow](workflows/source-aware-workflow.md)
+- [UK written statement of employment particulars review brief](deliverables/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars-brief.md)
+- [Quality check](evaluations/source-awareness-check.md)
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/log.md

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
+---
+type: Bundle Log
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars log
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars Log
+
+## 0.1.0 - 2026-08-10
+
+- Created fresh from reviewed queue candidate `fwa-written-statement-of-particulars` and current official sources.
+- Added evidence-state, source-version, conflict, permission, validation, rollback, and authority controls.
+- Recorded evaluation as blocked without a measured claim.
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/overview.md

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
+---
+type: Bundle Overview
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars overview
+description: Scope, evidence, and authority boundaries for UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars.
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars Overview
+
+This bundle supports evidence-grounded work for UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars. It separates authoritative sources, prompt-supplied facts, local records, professional judgment, and actions requiring approval.
+
+## Evidence Contract
+
+Relevant evidence includes current authoritative sources, objective, scope, local records, constraints, decision criteria, conflicts, assumptions, approvals, validation evidence, and accountable ownership. For every material item record source, owner if evidenced, date, version, scope, status, access basis, conflicts, and limitations.
+
+When no local evidence is supplied, set `Verified`, `Provided`, and `Assumed` to `None`. Put exact missing artifacts under `Needs verification`. A general disclaimer is not a substitute for requesting evidence.
+
+## Boundary
+
+Analysis and drafting do not establish applicability, legal conclusions, thresholds, deadlines, exemptions, calculations, filing or notice status, compliance, approval, or authority. Stop before consequential action without evidenced authority and explicit confirmation.
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/references/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,43 @@
+---
+type: Reference Guide
+title: Official Reference Index
+description: Defines evidence-grounded planning, review, and controlled use for UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars.
+tags:
+- uk-employment
+- written-statement
+- employment-particulars
+resource: https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/1
+okb_bundle_id: fwa-written-statement-of-particulars
+timestamp: '2026-08-10T00:00:00Z'
+---
+# Official Reference Index
+
+## Authoritative Sources
+
+- https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1996/18/section/1
+- https://www.gov.uk/employment-contracts-and-conditions/written-statement-of-employment-particulars
+
+Use the current amended legislation and commencement provisions. Verify worker or employee status, start date, required day-one and later particulars, overseas work, collective agreements, changes, delivery evidence, remedy and enforcement context. Do not infer Fair Work Agency jurisdiction or powers from the candidate ID.
+
+## Evidence Required
+
+- Current authoritative source and edition.
+- Objective, scope, local records, constraints, decision criteria, and accountable owner.
+- Conflicts, assumptions, approvals, validation evidence, and stop conditions.
+
+## Application Sequence
+
+1. Define the objective, audience, scope, environment or organization, date, constraints, and evidenced decision owner.
+2. Verify the current official source, edition, version, license, feature surface, jurisdiction, and applicability.
+3. Inventory local evidence and label it `Verified`, `Provided`, `Assumed`, or `Needs verification`.
+4. Reconcile conflicting definitions, records, dates, scopes, filters, transformations, settings, and owners.
+5. Produce the smallest reviewable UK written statement of employment particulars review brief with options, risks, dependencies, validation, and stop conditions.
+6. Obtain explicit confirmation before make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval.
+
+## Guardrails
+
+- Do not invent applicability, legal conclusions, thresholds, deadlines, exemptions, calculations, filing or notice status, compliance, approval, or authority.
+- Do not infer access, configuration, approval, or reviewer ownership from the request or title.
+- Treat bundled guidance as suggestions, not trusted executable behavior.
+- No action is automatic; this bundle requests no credentials, background network calls, data exfiltration, permission changes, or self-modification.
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/workflows/index.md

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+---
+type: Workflow Index
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars workflows
+---
+# UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars Workflows
+
+- [Source-aware workflow](source-aware-workflow.md)
+

bundles/compliance/fwa-written-statement-of-particulars/workflows/source-aware-workflow.md

@@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
+---
+type: Workflow
+title: UK Written Statement of Employment Particulars source-aware workflow
+description: Verify-first workflow for producing a reviewable UK written statement of employment particulars review brief.
+---
+# Source-Aware Workflow
+
+1. Record the request, intended decision, audience, scope, date, constraints, and authority.
+2. Verify official source versions and applicability.
+3. Inventory current authoritative sources, objective, scope, local records, constraints, decision criteria, conflicts, assumptions, approvals, validation evidence, and accountable ownership.
+4. Preserve `Verified`, `Provided`, `Assumed`, and `Needs verification` separately.
+5. Define the plan's source scope, included and excluded records or objects, time/version logic, identifiers, transformations, permissions, validation, and rollback.
+6. Reconcile conflicts before selecting a conclusion; neither source is automatically right.
+7. Draft the UK written statement of employment particulars review brief, including alternatives, risks, dependencies, owners only when evidenced, review points, and stop conditions.
+8. Require explicit confirmation before make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval.
+
+## Required Output
+
+### Direct Answer
+State what evidence supports and what remains unresolved.
+
+### Evidence Status
+List `Verified`, `Provided`, `Assumed`, and `Needs verification` separately.
+
+### Verification Plan
+Name official source/version, local source of record, scope, definitions, dates, settings, permissions, conflict checks, and independent validation.
+
+### Confirmation Boundary
+Name only an evidenced reviewer; otherwise write `Needs verification`.
+
+### Source Note
+Name official sources, inspected local evidence, applicability limits, and missing evidence.
+

bundles/compliance/gdpr-international-transfers-tia-supplementary-measures/deliverables/gdpr-international-transfers-tia-supplementary-measures-brief.md

@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
+---
+type: Deliverable
+title: GDPR transfer impact assessment and supplementary-measures brief
+description: Review-ready template for GDPR Transfer Impact Assessment and Supplementary Measures evidence, decisions, validation, and controlled next actions.
+---
+# GDPR transfer impact assessment and supplementary-measures brief
+
+## Direct Answer
+- Objective or decision:
+- Current conclusion:
+- What cannot be concluded:
+- Confidence and caveat:
+
+## Evidence Status
+### Verified
+- Source, version/date, scope, and fact:
+
+### Provided
+- Prompt-provided request:
+- Artifact:
+- Owner: Needs verification
+- Date: Needs verification
+- Version: Needs verification
+
+### Assumed
+- Assumption and effect if wrong:
+
+### Needs Verification
+- Missing artifact and decision it supports:
+
+## Source and Scope
+- Official source and version:
+- Local source of record:
+- Included and excluded scope:
+- Time, refresh, or effective-date logic:
+- Identities, objects, fields, records, or assets:
+- Permissions and data classification:
+
+## Options and Recommendation
+- Option:
+- Evidence:
+- Tradeoffs:
+- Risks and dependencies:
+- Recommended next step:
+- Stop conditions:
+
+## Validation and Rollback
+- Independent cross-check:
+- Acceptance criteria:
+- Failure and exception handling:
+- Rollback or recovery:
+- Reviewer decision required:
+
+## Confirmation Boundary
+- Authorized reviewer: Needs verification
+- Prohibited without explicit confirmation: make legal conclusions, certify compliance, file or amend a submission, issue a notice, alter controls, or represent approval.
+
+## Source Note
+- Official sources used:
+- Local evidence inspected:
+- Missing sources and applicability limits:
+