Conversation
WalkthroughThis update introduces client-side routing to the application by integrating Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Browser
participant App
participant BrowserRouter
participant Router
participant MainLayout
participant HomePage
participant AboutPage
User->>Browser: Navigates to "/"
Browser->>App: Loads App
App->>BrowserRouter: Initializes routing context
BrowserRouter->>Router: Renders routes
Router->>MainLayout: Renders for "/"
MainLayout->>HomePage: Renders index route ("/")
User->>MainLayout: Clicks "About"
MainLayout->>Router: Navigates to "/about"
Router->>MainLayout: Renders for "/"
MainLayout->>AboutPage: Renders nested "about" route
Poem
Warning There were issues while running some tools. Please review the errors and either fix the tool's configuration or disable the tool if it's a critical failure. 🔧 ESLint
npm warn config production Use ✨ Finishing Touches
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR integrates client-side routing by adding a Router component and corresponding layouts/pages, updates testing configuration to include a Vitest setup file, and adjusts the application entry point and dependencies to support react-router-dom.
- Register
vitest.setup.tsin Vite and TypeScript configs - Introduce
Router,MainLayout, andHomePagecomponents with tests - Update
Appto wrap the newRouterinBrowserRouter
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 13 out of 13 changed files in this pull request and generated 1 comment.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| vite.config.ts | Add setupFiles entry for Vitest setup |
| tsconfig.app.json | Include Vitest setup file |
| src/router/index.tsx | New Router component defining routes |
| src/pages/home/index.tsx | New HomePage component |
| src/pages/home/home.test.ts | Update tests to render HomePage |
| src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx | New MainLayout with navigation links |
| src/lib/layouts/main/main.test.tsx | Add integration test for MainLayout |
| src/app.tsx | Wrap Router in BrowserRouter in App |
| package.json | Add react-router-dom and @testing-library/user-event |
| eslint.config.js | Allow capitalized prop names in ESLint config |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (4)
src/pages/home/home.test.ts:1
- The test uses
toBeInTheDocument()but the import of@testing-library/jest-dom/vitestwas removed. Add that import back to enable the matcher.
import { render, screen } from '@testing-library/react';
src/pages/home/home.test.ts:5
- [nitpick] The test suite is named 'Badge' but it tests
HomePage. Rename it to accurately reflect the component under test.
describe('Badge', () => {
src/router/index.tsx:1
- [nitpick] Consider adding a test for the
Routercomponent itself to verify that routes render as expected at the top level.
import { Route, Routes } from 'react-router-dom';
vite.config.ts:11
- The referenced setup file
vitest.setup.tsdoes not exist in the repo. Ensure you add that file or correct the path.
setupFiles: ['./vitest.setup.ts'],
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 4
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
3-5: Consider using semantic HTML elements.While the current implementation works, consider using semantic HTML elements instead of a React Fragment for better accessibility and SEO.
export function HomePage() { - return <>Home Page</>; + return <main>Home Page</main>; }This provides better semantic meaning and accessibility for screen readers.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (11)
eslint.config.js(1 hunks)package.json(1 hunks)src/app.test.ts(0 hunks)src/app.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/lib/layouts/main/main.test.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/home/home.test.ts(1 hunks)src/pages/home/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/router/index.tsx(1 hunks)tsconfig.app.json(1 hunks)vite.config.ts(1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- src/app.test.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (4)
src/router/index.tsx (2)
src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx (1)
MainLayout(3-18)src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
HomePage(3-5)
src/lib/layouts/main/main.test.tsx (2)
src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx (1)
MainLayout(3-18)src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
HomePage(3-5)
src/app.tsx (1)
src/router/index.tsx (1)
Router(5-15)
src/pages/home/home.test.ts (1)
src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
HomePage(3-5)
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
tsconfig.app.json
[error] 27-27: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]
(parse)
[error] 27-27: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]
(parse)
[error] 27-27: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]
(parse)
[error] 27-28: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values: [1, 2]
(parse)
🪛 GitHub Actions: 🧪 Unit Testing
src/lib/layouts/main/main.test.tsx
[error] 1-1: Test failure in 'MainLayout with Router' > 'renders layout with Home route': TypeError in React Router Link component - Cannot destructure property 'basename' of 'React10.useContext(...)' as it is null. This caused the test to fail with 'Unable to find an element with the text: Home.'
🔇 Additional comments (11)
package.json (1)
26-26: LGTM: Testing utility addition.The addition of
@testing-library/user-eventenhances testing capabilities for simulating user interactions, which aligns well with the new routing functionality.src/pages/home/home.test.ts (1)
5-10: LGTM: Test structure and assertions.The test structure is well-organized with proper imports and clear test description. The assertion correctly verifies the component renders the expected content.
src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
1-1: LGTM: CSS import.The CSS import follows standard React patterns and will properly scope styles to this component.
eslint.config.js (1)
45-50: LGTM: ESLint rule update for React TypeScript conventions.Adding capitalized variants (
Props,Prop,Ref,Refs) to the allowed abbreviations list aligns with standard React TypeScript naming conventions where type definitions typically use PascalCase.tsconfig.app.json (1)
27-27: LGTM! Configuration change aligns with test setup.The addition of
"vitest.setup.ts"to the include array ensures TypeScript compilation and type checking for the test setup file, which aligns with thesetupFilesconfiguration invite.config.ts.The static analysis parsing errors appear to be false positives - the JSON syntax is correct.
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 27-27: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 27-27: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 27-27: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
[error] 27-28: End of file expected
Use an array for a sequence of values:
[1, 2](parse)
src/app.tsx (2)
1-3: Clean routing implementation setup.The imports are properly structured and the transition from static content to a routing-based architecture follows React Router best practices.
6-10:Details
✅ Verification successful
Verify Router component implementation and dependencies.
The BrowserRouter setup is correct and follows React Router conventions. However, ensure that:
- The
react-router-domdependency is properly installed- The custom
Routercomponent from./routeris correctly implemented
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify react-router-dom dependency and Router component implementation # Check if react-router-dom is in package.json echo "Checking react-router-dom dependency:" cat package.json | jq '.dependencies["react-router-dom"]' 2>/dev/null || echo "react-router-dom not found in dependencies" # Check Router component implementation echo -e "\nChecking Router component:" cat src/router/index.tsx 2>/dev/null || echo "Router component file not found"Length of output: 691
All set: react-router-dom is installed and Router component is correctly implemented
- package.json includes
"react-router-dom": "^7.5.3".- src/router/index.tsx exports
Routerusing<Routes>and<Route>as expected (matches React Router v7 conventions).No further action needed—code changes are approved.
vite.config.ts (1)
11-11:Details
✅ Verification successful
Test setup configuration looks good.
The addition of
setupFiles: ['./vitest.setup.ts']properly configures the test environment setup and aligns with the TypeScript configuration changes intsconfig.app.json.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Verify that vitest.setup.ts exists and check its contents echo "Checking if vitest.setup.ts exists:" if [ -f "vitest.setup.ts" ]; then echo "File exists. Contents:" cat vitest.setup.ts else echo "vitest.setup.ts file not found" fiLength of output: 229
Test setup file verified and configuration approved
- vite.config.ts includes
setupFiles: ['./vitest.setup.ts']to initialize the test environment.- vitest.setup.ts exists at project root and imports
@testing-library/jest-dom/vitest, enabling DOM matchers.All changes align with Vitest and TypeScript best practices—no further action required.
src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx (1)
3-18: Excellent layout implementation with good accessibility practices.The MainLayout component demonstrates several best practices:
- Semantic HTML structure: Proper use of
header,nav, andmainelements- Accessibility: Includes
role="navigation",aria-label="Main navigation",role="main", andaria-hidden="true"for the separator- Clean routing integration: Proper use of
Linkfor navigation andOutletfor nested content- TypeScript: Correctly typed as
React.FCThe component provides a solid foundation for the application's navigation structure.
src/router/index.tsx (1)
1-15: LGTM! Well-structured routing setup.The routing structure follows React Router best practices with:
- Proper nested routing using MainLayout as the parent route
- Index route for the home page
- Logical separation of authentication routes
The implementation is clean and maintainable.
src/lib/layouts/main/main.test.tsx (1)
31-46: Test logic is correct once the routes structure is fixed.The test appropriately verifies:
- Initial render of navigation elements and home page content
- Navigation functionality when clicking the About link
- Proper content updates after navigation
The user event handling and assertions are well-structured.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull Request Overview
This PR introduces client-side routing with a main layout, home page, and basic navigation, plus updates testing configuration and adds tests for the new components.
- Added Vitest setup file in Vite and TypeScript configs
- Created
Router,MainLayout, andHomePagecomponents with navigation - Wrote tests for home page rendering and layout navigation
Reviewed Changes
Copilot reviewed 14 out of 14 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.
Show a summary per file
| File | Description |
|---|---|
| vite.config.ts | Registered vitest.setup.ts for test initialization |
| tsconfig.app.json | Included vitest.setup.ts in compilation include |
| src/router/index.tsx | Defined application routes and layout hierarchy |
| src/pages/home/index.tsx | Added HomePage component and styling import |
| src/pages/home/home.test.ts | Test for HomePage rendering |
| src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx | Implemented MainLayout with navigation links |
| src/lib/layouts/main/main.test.tsx | Integration test for layout navigation |
| src/app.tsx | Wrapped App with BrowserRouter and Router |
| package.json | Added react-router-dom and user-event dependencies |
| eslint.config.js | Expanded prop/ref allowList in ESLint configuration |
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)
src/router/index.tsx:12
- The new Auth route isn’t covered by any tests; consider adding a test that navigates to
/authand asserts the Auth content is rendered.
<Route path="auth" element={<div>Auth</div>} />
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
src/pages/home/home.test.tsx (2)
1-3: Consider removing the .tsx extension from the import.The import on line 3 includes the
.tsxextension, which is typically unnecessary in TypeScript/React projects as the module resolver can determine the file type automatically.-import { HomePage } from './index.tsx'; +import { HomePage } from './index';
5-10: Basic test implementation is appropriate for the simple component.The test correctly verifies that the HomePage component renders and displays the expected text. This is appropriate given the component's simplicity (just rendering "Home Page"). However, consider adding a few enhancements for better test coverage:
Consider adding these optional improvements:
describe('HomePage', () => { test('renders successfully', () => { render(<HomePage />); expect(screen.getByText('Home Page')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); + + test('renders as expected structure', () => { + const { container } = render(<HomePage />); + expect(container.firstChild).toMatchSnapshot(); + }); });Alternatively, you could add accessibility testing:
+import { axe, toHaveNoViolations } from 'jest-axe'; + +expect.extend(toHaveNoViolations); + describe('HomePage', () => { test('renders successfully', () => { render(<HomePage />); expect(screen.getByText('Home Page')).toBeInTheDocument(); }); + + test('has no accessibility violations', async () => { + const { container } = render(<HomePage />); + const results = await axe(container); + expect(results).toHaveNoViolations(); + }); });
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/pages/home/home.test.tsx(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/pages/home/home.test.tsx (1)
src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
HomePage(3-5)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
♻️ Duplicate comments (1)
src/router/index.tsx (1)
16-16: Catch-all route properly implemented.Good implementation of the catch-all route for handling unmatched URLs, which addresses the previous review feedback.
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
src/pages/errors/not-found.tsx (1)
1-3: Enhance the NotFound component for better user experience.While the component is functionally correct, it could benefit from improvements to provide a better user experience:
- Use semantic HTML elements (e.g.,
<h1>,<p>)- Provide user-friendly messaging
- Include navigation back to home
- Add proper accessibility attributes
Consider this enhanced implementation:
export function NotFound() { - return <div>not-found</div>; + return ( + <div className="not-found-page"> + <h1>Page Not Found</h1> + <p>Sorry, the page you are looking for does not exist.</p> + <Link to="/">Go back to Home</Link> + </div> + ); }Don't forget to import
Linkfromreact-router-dom.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx(1 hunks)src/pages/errors/not-found.tsx(1 hunks)src/router/index.tsx(1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code Graph Analysis (1)
src/router/index.tsx (3)
src/lib/layouts/main/index.tsx (1)
MainLayout(3-18)src/pages/home/index.tsx (1)
HomePage(3-5)src/pages/errors/not-found.tsx (1)
NotFound(1-3)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/router/index.tsx (1)
8-18: Routing structure follows React Router best practices.The nested routing structure with MainLayout as the parent route and proper use of index routes is well-implemented. The separation of auth routes outside the main layout makes architectural sense.
1 participant
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Tests
Chores