Open
Conversation
jl-wynen
force-pushed
the
load-more-metadata
branch
from
a9b50e6 to
bea53d8
Compare
MridulS
reviewed
Mar 6, 2026
|
|
||
| Supplements the result with data from ``beamline`` if necessary. | ||
| """ | ||
| from scippneutron.metadata import RadiationProbe, SourceType |
Member
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Any particualr reason for this inline import?
Member
Author
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I thought I'd keep the scippneutron types hidden (as opposed to Source[T] which is defined in ESSreduce. But that should not be an issue
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
So far, we have been hard-coding the source in workflows that use it. But the coda nexus files now contain enough information to load this instead.
This will help with scipp/essdiffraction#100