Skip to content

Revert "[python] Add new SOMAContext class and deprecate SOMATileDBContext (#4363)"#4464

Open
XanthosXanthopoulos wants to merge 5 commits into
release-3.0from
xan/revert-SOMAContext
Open

Revert "[python] Add new SOMAContext class and deprecate SOMATileDBContext (#4363)"#4464
XanthosXanthopoulos wants to merge 5 commits into
release-3.0from
xan/revert-SOMAContext

Conversation

@XanthosXanthopoulos

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Issue and/or context:

Changes:

Notes for Reviewer:

@codecov

codecov Bot commented May 25, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 95.00000% with 5 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 85.28%. Comparing base (270d944) to head (48cee5b).

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##           release-3.0    #4464    +/-   ##
=============================================
  Coverage        85.27%   85.28%            
=============================================
  Files              136      135     -1     
  Lines            21266    21140   -126     
=============================================
- Hits             18135    18029   -106     
+ Misses            3131     3111    -20     
Flag Coverage Δ
python 88.52% <95.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Components Coverage Δ
python_api 88.52% <95.00%> (+0.07%) ⬆️
libtiledbsoma ∅ <ø> (∅)
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@XanthosXanthopoulos XanthosXanthopoulos marked this pull request as ready for review May 25, 2026 13:19

@jp-dark jp-dark left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants