Use official JupyterLite lifecycle instead of fragile log-based readiness detection#120
Open
mohab-elshamy wants to merge 1 commit intosoft-eng-practicum:developfrom
Open
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Background
The current Analysim–JupyterLite integration detects readiness by intercepting an internal log message:
This approach is fragile since it depends on undocumented logging behavior and may break with future JupyterLite updates.
Solution
This PR introduces a pure frontend JupyterLab extension that:
app.restoredto ensure JupyterLite is fully initializedThe extension is published on PyPI and added to
requirements.txt, allowing anyone to install it easily:Benefits
Closes #114