feat(msteams): expose exact feedback hook facts#2
Closed
jimmypuckett wants to merge 2 commits into
Closed
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What Problem This Solves
Microsoft Teams can return reactions and written feedback for a specific agent response, but the channel did not expose enough native hook data to bind that feedback to the exact provider activity and agent run.
Why This Change Was Made
This adds harness-neutral message hook enrichment and Microsoft Teams native feedback facts. OpenClaw emits provider-confirmed response IDs with the concrete run ID, exact reply targets for inbound messages, and typed untrusted reaction/comment facts. It does not contain an Ops-specific schema, persistence, deployment, or remediation behavior.
User Impact
Operator-managed hooks can correlate a Teams response, reaction, or threaded comment without guessing from conversation order. Consumers remain responsible for validation, redaction, retention, and fail-closed handling when a provider identifier is absent.
Evidence
git diff --check: passedReview Notes
AI Assistance
AI-assisted implementation and tests; human review and merge are required.