[BUG] Fix #511: BFT Auditor consensus hangs indefinitely on provider timeout#524
[BUG] Fix #511: BFT Auditor consensus hangs indefinitely on provider timeout#524adityakryadav wants to merge 2 commits into
Conversation
|
Warning Review limit reached
Next review available in: 58 minutes Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available. How can I continue?After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews. How do review limits work?CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability. For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window. Please refer docs for additional details. Review details⚙️ Run configurationConfiguration used: Organization UI Review profile: CHILL Plan: Pro Plus Run ID: 📒 Files selected for processing (3)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
🧪 PR Test Results
Python 3.12 · commit 37a6f9d |
….py and tests/test_multiagent.py
|
@adityakryadav is attempting to deploy a commit to the sreerevanth's projects Team on Vercel. A member of the Team first needs to authorize it. |
sreerevanth
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Thanks for the contribution! I like the idea of preventing indefinite hangs. Before we merge this, I'd like to keep the implementation aligned with the existing auditing architecture rather than introducing a new BFT auditor implementation. Could you update the existing consensus logic to add timeout handling, make the timeout configurable, and include a regression test that simulates a stalled provider? That would make the fix much easier to integrate.
Summary
Closes #511.
When one or more auditor providers stalled indefinitely, the
asyncio.gather()call in the consensus logic would hang forever, blocking the entire audit pipeline.Changes
agentwatch/auditors/bft_auditor.py(new file) - IntroducesBFTAuditor:audit_step()wrapsasyncio.gather()withasyncio.wait_for(..., timeout=1.5).asyncio.TimeoutError, returns{"error": "Global consensus timeout", "consensus_score": 0.0}immediately instead of hanging.{"error": "Quorum not reached", ...}.agentwatch/auditors/__init__.py(new file) - ExportsBFTAuditor.How to test