Add asset comparison #2174
Add asset comparison #2174
Conversation
|
Preview is available here: |
6 similar comments
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
1 similar comment
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
leighmcculloch
left a comment
leighmcculloch
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Some thoughts inline, the main one being I think we are introducing the "classic" term here unnecessarily. This change looks like both a refactor and new information about SEP-57.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Pull request overview
This PR rewrites the Stellar tokenization documentation page to present a broader comparison of tokenization models on Stellar: Classic Assets (with SAC), SEP-41 contract tokens, and regulated SEP-57 / ERC-3643 tokens. It adds a structured decision guide and comparison table to help issuers choose the appropriate model.
Changes:
- Retitles and restructures the page around “Tokenization Model Comparison on Stellar”, replacing the previous binary “assets vs contract tokens” framing.
- Adds detailed sections describing Classic Stellar Assets with SAC, SEP-41 contract tokens, and ERC-3643 / SEP-57 (T-REX) tokens, including strengths, tradeoffs, and recommended use cases.
- Introduces a comparison table, decision guide, expanded SAC explanation, and additional reference links to SEPs and example implementations.
💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
1 similar comment
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
2 similar comments
|
Preview is available here: |
|
Preview is available here: |
No description provided.