Preliminary Checks
Description
Camera::open() takes 5-7 seconds when opening SVO2 files recorded at the ZED X native resolution (1920x1200), even with DEPTH_MODE::NONE and camera_disable_self_calib = true. The same camera serial opening a 1920x1080 SVO file completes in 0.1-0.4 seconds — a ~50x difference with no depth or self-calibration involved.
Steps to Reproduce
import pyzed.sl as sl
import time
# Requires two SVO files from the same ZED X camera:
# - one recorded at 1920x1080
# - one recorded at 1920x1200 (native resolution)
FILES = {
"1080p": "/path/to/recording_1080p.svo2",
"1200p": "/path/to/recording_1200p.svo2",
}
for label, path in FILES.items():
zed = sl.Camera()
init = sl.InitParameters()
init.set_from_svo_file(path)
init.depth_mode = sl.DEPTH_MODE.NONE
init.camera_disable_self_calib = True
t0 = time.time()
status = zed.open(init)
elapsed = time.time() - t0
if status == sl.ERROR_CODE.SUCCESS:
info = zed.get_camera_information()
res = f"{info.camera_configuration.resolution.width}x{info.camera_configuration.resolution.height}"
print(f"{label}: open={elapsed:.2f}s, res={res}, serial={info.serial_number}")
zed.close()
else:
print(f"{label}: FAILED ({status}) in {elapsed:.2f}s")
Expected Result
Camera::open() with DEPTH_MODE::NONE and camera_disable_self_calib = true should complete in under 1 second regardless of resolution, since no depth computation, neural model loading, or self-calibration is requested.
Actual Result
Camera::open() takes 5-7 seconds for 1920x1200 SVO files, even though:
- Depth mode is
NONE
- Self-calibration is disabled
- GPU utilization is 0% during the call
- The files are smaller than the fast-opening 1080p files
This creates a significant bottleneck in SVO processing pipelines. In our case, processing 4 SVO files (one per camera angle) takes ~20-26 seconds wall time, with open() accounting for nearly all of it.
ZED Camera model
ZED
Environment
- Platform: x86_64 Linux (Ubuntu 22.04)
- GPU: NVIDIA RTX (CUDA 12.8)
- ZED SDK: 5.2
- Python API: pyzed
- Cameras: 4x ZED X (GMSL2), serials 42380488, 45973857, 46164128, 48026452
- Docker base image: `stereolabs/zed:5.2-devel-cuda12.8-ubuntu22.04`
- SVO files: Recorded at 1920x1200 (native), H265 compression, 5 frames, 30 FPS
Anything else?
Observed Behavior
| File |
Resolution |
Serial |
Size |
open() time |
| test_1frame.svo |
1920x1080 |
46164128 |
14.5 MB |
0.39s |
| prod_0.svo2 |
1920x1200 |
46164128 |
1.2 MB |
5.50s |
| prod_180.svo2 |
1920x1200 |
42380488 |
1.1 MB |
4.84s |
| prod_270.svo2 |
1920x1200 |
45973857 |
1.4 MB |
6.27s |
| prod_90.svo2 |
1920x1200 |
48026452 |
1.1 MB |
5.16s |
Preliminary Checks
Description
Camera::open()takes 5-7 seconds when opening SVO2 files recorded at the ZED X native resolution (1920x1200), even withDEPTH_MODE::NONEandcamera_disable_self_calib = true. The same camera serial opening a 1920x1080 SVO file completes in 0.1-0.4 seconds — a ~50x difference with no depth or self-calibration involved.Steps to Reproduce
Expected Result
Camera::open()withDEPTH_MODE::NONEandcamera_disable_self_calib = trueshould complete in under 1 second regardless of resolution, since no depth computation, neural model loading, or self-calibration is requested.Actual Result
Camera::open()takes 5-7 seconds for 1920x1200 SVO files, even though:NONEThis creates a significant bottleneck in SVO processing pipelines. In our case, processing 4 SVO files (one per camera angle) takes ~20-26 seconds wall time, with
open()accounting for nearly all of it.ZED Camera model
ZED
Environment
- Platform: x86_64 Linux (Ubuntu 22.04) - GPU: NVIDIA RTX (CUDA 12.8) - ZED SDK: 5.2 - Python API: pyzed - Cameras: 4x ZED X (GMSL2), serials 42380488, 45973857, 46164128, 48026452 - Docker base image: `stereolabs/zed:5.2-devel-cuda12.8-ubuntu22.04` - SVO files: Recorded at 1920x1200 (native), H265 compression, 5 frames, 30 FPSAnything else?
Observed Behavior
open()time