Skip to content

studiomeyer-io/darwin-agents

Part of the StudioMeyer MCP Stack — Built in Mallorca 🌴 · ⭐ if you use it

darwin

License Last commit GitHub stars

**AI agents that improve themselves.**

npm version npm downloads CI License: MIT TypeScript Node

Build AI agent teams that learn from every run.
Self-evolving prompts. A/B tested. Safety-gated.

Quick Start · Agents · How It Works · CLI · FAQ

npm install darwin-agents better-sqlite3
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...  # or OPENAI_API_KEY, or use Claude CLI
npx darwin run writer "Explain quantum computing simply"

A note from us

We have been building tools and systems for ourselves for the past two years. The fact that this repo is small and has few stars is not because it is new. It is because we only just decided to share what we have built. It is not a fresh experiment, it is a long story with a recent commit.

We love building things and sharing them. We do not love social media tactics, growth hacks, or chasing stars and followers. So this repo is small. The code is real, it gets used, issues get answered. Judge for yourself.

If it helps you, sharing, testing, and feedback help us. If it could be better, an issue is more useful. If you build something with it, tell us at hello@studiomeyer.io. That genuinely makes our day.

From a small studio in Palma de Mallorca.

What is this?

Darwin is a TypeScript framework for building AI agents that automatically optimize their own prompts through experimentation, evaluation, and evolution.

Traditional AI agents use static prompts. You write them once, and they never improve. Darwin changes that:

  1. Your agent runs a task
  2. A Critic agent evaluates the output (quality, sources, structure)
  3. After enough runs, Darwin detects patterns ("weak on technical topics")
  4. It generates an improved prompt variant
  5. A/B tests the new variant against the current one
  6. The winner becomes the default — your agent got better, automatically
You run an agent
       │
       ▼
Darwin measures quality
       │
       ▼
Patterns emerge over time
       │
       ▼
New prompt variant generated
       │
       ▼
A/B tested against current
       │
       ▼
Winner becomes default
       │
Your agent got better.
You did nothing.

Why this isn't a toy. The loop runs behind a real production safety gate — regression rollback to last-known-good, data-quality guards that pause evolution during a tool outage, and an alignment check on every mutation so a rewrite can't quietly erode a safety constraint. It can drive that mutation with a GEPA reflective optimizer running online, inside the gate (not as an offline batch step), and the A/B gate supports always-valid sequential tests (mSPRT / Hoeffding) so checking after every run doesn't inflate false positives. Details: reflective evolution · statistical rigor.

Quick Start

# Install
npm install darwin-agents better-sqlite3

# Set your API key (or use Claude CLI if installed)
export ANTHROPIC_API_KEY=sk-ant-...

# Run your first agent
npx darwin run writer "Explain the CAP theorem in simple terms"

# Enable evolution
npx darwin evolve writer --enable

# Watch it improve over time
npx darwin status writer

Define your own agent in 12 lines

import { defineAgent } from 'darwin-agents';

export default defineAgent({
  name: 'summarizer',
  role: 'Text Summarizer',
  description: 'Summarizes text into key points.',
  systemPrompt: `Summarize the given text in 3 bullet points.
Be concise. No fluff. Capture the essence.`,
  evolution: {
    enabled: true,
    evaluator: 'critic',
  },
});

Reflective evolution — GEPA, online (v0.6, opt-in)

By default Darwin mutates prompts from aggregate stats. Turn on useGepa and the evolution loop instead generates each challenger with a GEPA-style reflector — it reads the recent critic feedback Darwin already collects and writes the smallest targeted edit that fixes the failure modes, then A/B-tests it against live traffic like any other variant. This is the part no other TypeScript framework ships: a GEPA reflective optimizer running inside a production safety gate, not as an offline batch job.

evolution: {
  enabled: true,
  evaluator: 'multi-critic',
  useGepa: true,                       // reflective generation instead of stats-meta-prompt
  reflectionModel: 'claude-opus-4-8',  // GEPA's leverage point — use a STRONGER model here
  paretoGate: true,                    // activate a challenger only if it's a true Pareto improvement
},

Everything degrades safely: with no critic feedback yet (cold start), on any reflector error, or if a mutation would erode a safety constraint, the loop falls back to the default optimizer. The same alignment guard now runs on both paths. Pair with requireConfidence on your SafetyThresholds for a peeking-resistant A/B gate. All of it is off unless you opt in — existing agents behave exactly as before.

Statistical rigor + coverage sampling (v0.7, opt-in)

v0.7 makes the evolution loop statistically honest and brings the GEPA optimizer closer to the paper. Every piece is additive and off by default (one exception: the feedback window default rose from 5 to 15):

import { SafetyGate, DarwinLoop } from 'darwin-agents';

// Always-valid sequential A/B gate — peeking-resistant after every run.
const safety = new SafetyGate({
  minDataPoints: 10,
  maxRegression: 0.2,
  failureRollbackThreshold: 3,
  requireConfidence: true,
  confidenceMethod: 'msprt',   // Mixture SPRT (or 'hoeffding' — σ-free, conservative)
});

const loop = new DarwinLoop({
  memory, tracker, optimizer, safety, patterns, agent,
  embed: myBatchEmbedder,      // opt-in semantic alignment guard (zero hard deps — injected)
});
  • mSPRT / Hoeffding confidence sequences — a margin win is adopted only when it clears an always-valid significance bar, so monitoring after every run no longer inflates false positives.
  • ε-Pareto gate (evolution.paretoEpsilon) — forgive a microscopic regression on one objective when a challenger wins decisively on another.
  • Instance-wise coverage sampling (useCoverage + per-variant perKeyScores) — GEPA Algorithm 2: keep/sample the variants that excel on the most different task subsets, not N copies of the global-average winner.
  • System-aware merge (useMerge + mergeEveryK) — every K-th cycle, merge the two best Pareto-front prompt versions in the agent's history into one challenger (paper Appendix-D, ~+5% lift), instead of a reflective mutation.
  • Semantic alignment guard — a reworded safety constraint is no longer a false rejection; a removed one still is (fail-closed without an embedder).
  • Epoch-shuffled reflection minibatch (reflectionMinibatchSize) + a configurable feedbackWindow (default 15).
  • Style-bias-free judging (normalizeForJudging) — strip markdown before the critic scores, so it measures content not formatting.

Drift detection — validate-by-reproduce canary (v0.9)

The A/B gate guards prompt quality. The canary guards behaviour: a model update or a broken tool can change how an agent reaches its answer (different tools, more turns, more errors) while the quality score stays flat. darwin canary re-checks recent runs against a frozen baseline and flags that drift.

darwin canary writer                 # Stable / drift / insufficient-data report
darwin canary writer --json          # Machine-readable, for dashboards
darwin canary writer --exit-on-drift # Non-zero exit on drift, for CI

It compares execution trajectories (captured opt-in since v0.5) with tolerance-based metrics — unordered tool-set Jaccard, ordered sequence similarity, turn-count ratio, error-rate delta — never an exact hash (LLM runs are non-deterministic). Drift has to be a pattern (≥2 of N runs), and the baseline is pinned to the active prompt version, so an intentional evolution reports insufficient-data (re-baseline), not a false alarm. The metrics and the runCanaryOverExperiments orchestrator are exported for your own pipelines.

Cross-family judging: with more than one provider key present, Darwin already spreads the three critics across model families to cut LLM-as-judge bias. With only one key they collapse onto a single family (note: claude-cli and anthropic-api are the same family) — Darwin now warns, and hard-fails under DARWIN_REQUIRE_CROSS_FAMILY=1 for strict / CI setups.

Built-in Agents

Agent What it does Needs
writer Content writing, explanations, copy Nothing (zero-config)
researcher Web research with source citations Tavily API key
critic Evaluates other agents' output (1-10) Nothing
analyst Code quality analysis Filesystem access

Each agent ships with a dedicated multi-critic set that scores the output by the right criteria for that agent type (research = source quality + analytical depth + completeness, analyst = technical accuracy with file:line refs + pattern recognition + recommendation quality, etc.). Custom agents can register their own critic sets — see examples/custom-agent.ts and src/evolution/multi-critic.ts.

Closed-Loop & Observability (v0.4.6)

Two production patterns Darwin users commonly need but had to build themselves:

  • examples/closed-loop-feedback.ts — pipe critic findings into your own memory store so the next run sees them. Symmetric (writes both successes and failures), backend-agnostic. Aligned with reflective self-improvement patterns like GEPA (ICLR 2026 Oral) and NousResearch's hermes-agent-self-evolution loop.
  • examples/staleness-monitor.ts — detect agents that stopped firing, or were configured but never fired. Pure classifier + format helpers + ready-made SQL. Wire to your own cron + alert webhook.

Memory Integration (v0.4.7 — works with any MCP-compliant memory server)

Closes the loop in three lines. Defaults to zero-config local memory; one config switch points at Mem0 / Zep / Letta / Cognee / a self-hosted MCP server / your own.

Why this is different

Existing self-evolving agent frameworks pick one memory backend and stay there. Existing MCP-memory servers (Mem0, Zep, Letta, MemPalace, agentmemory, brainctl) optimize for storage, not for closed-loop critic feedback. Darwin v0.4.7 is the first MIT-licensed, TypeScript-native, MCP-native combination of pluggable memory + symmetric self-evolution (score < 5 → mistake, score ≥ 8 → pattern, mediocre middle band → not persisted). No vendor lock-in, no cloud required by default, swap-able to Mem0/Zep/Letta with two config lines.

import { localMemory, remoteMemory } from 'darwin-agents/memory/bridge';
import { runClosedLoopTurn } from 'darwin-agents/memory/closed-loop';

// Default: spawn @studiomeyer/local-memory-mcp via npx — zero cloud, zero keys
const memory = localMemory();

// Or any remote MCP-Memory server
// const memory = remoteMemory('https://your-mcp.example.com/mcp', { authHeader: `Bearer ${KEY}` });

// Or Mem0 with the built-in preset — handles tool names + arg shape for you
// import { mem0Preset } from 'darwin-agents/memory/bridge';
// const memory = remoteMemory('https://api.mem0.ai/mcp', {
//   authHeader: `Bearer ${process.env.MEM0_KEY}`,
//   ...mem0Preset({ userId: 'darwin-agent', defaultMetadata: { project: 'darwin' } }),
// });

const result = await runClosedLoopTurn(
  { agentName: 'analyst', topic: 'Audit module X' },
  { runner: yourAgentRunner, store: memory },
);
// Run 1 sees zero lessons. Run 2 sees Run 1's findings as context.

Provider matrix

Provider writeTool readTool Notes
@studiomeyer/local-memory-mcp (default) memory_learn memory_search zero-config, single SQLite file, no cloud
Any self-hosted MCP-Memory server memory_learn memory_search same wire, remote endpoint
Mem0 MCP (mem0ai/mem0-mcp) add_memory search_memories use ...mem0Preset({ userId }) — handles tool names + arg shape + the memory field in result rows
Zep MCP zep_add zep_search optional mapWriteArgs for group_id
Letta MCP archival_insert archival_search optional mapReadResult for their envelope
Cognee MCP cognee_add cognee_search optional mappers

Why an MCP-shaped bridge? Because the wire is the same — only tool names and arg shapes vary. One bridge, one reconnect path, one timeout policy. The pattern matches the MCP Bridge proxy paper (arXiv 2504.08999) but stays inside the Darwin process — no extra service to deploy.

v0.4.9 polish (2026-05-22)

  • Spec-compliant transport. Every HTTP request now carries the MCP-Protocol-Version: 2025-11-25 header, per MCP spec 2025-11-25 §"HTTP Protocol Versioning". Strict servers MAY return 400 without it; pre-v0.4.9 only sent the version inside the initialize payload.

  • Typed errors. Bridge errors are now instances of McpBridgeProtocolError (JSON-RPC errors from the server, numeric code) or McpBridgeTransportError (local timeouts, EPIPE, network resets, child exits — stable string code). Branch on instanceof to decide retry vs fail-loud without parsing message text.

    import {
      McpBridgeProtocolError,
      McpBridgeTransportError,
    } from 'darwin-agents/memory/bridge';
    
    try {
      await memory.save(record);
    } catch (err) {
      if (err instanceof McpBridgeTransportError && err.code === 'timeout') {
        // local timeout — safe to retry
      } else if (err instanceof McpBridgeProtocolError && err.code === -32602) {
        // server said our args are invalid — fail loud, don't retry
      }
    }
  • Per-call timeouts. save() and fetchRelevant() accept a timeoutMs override that beats the bridge-level default, mirroring the MCP SDK's client.callTool(..., { timeout }). Useful for one-off slow embedding searches without raising requestTimeoutMs globally.

    await memory.fetchRelevant({ query: 'audit', limit: 5, timeoutMs: 30_000 });
    await memory.save(record, { timeoutMs: 5_000 });
  • Mem0 preset. ...mem0Preset({ userId }) wires the right tool names (add_memory + search_memories) and arg shapes for the official mem0ai/mem0-mcp server. See the example above.

See examples/memory-darwin-integration.ts for the full closed-loop pattern: fetch relevant lessons → render them as prompt context → run the agent → persist critic findings → next run sees last run's lessons.

How Evolution Works

Real results from our own production use (Mar–Jun 2026)

Actual numbers from 419 runs across 19 agents in our internal darwin_db — not synthetic benchmarks. "Success" means the run completed and produced valid output (100% across 419 runs); "quality" is the critic's separate 1–10 score.

Those 19 are our own internal + custom agents; the package ships 8 built-in agents by default (writer, researcher, critic, analyst, investigator, investigator-critic, marketing, blog-writer) — the table below shows the four with enough runs to report.

Agent          Runs   Avg quality
writer          172   6.94 / 10
marketing        70   7.74 / 10
investigator     28   8.33 / 10
blog-writer       5   8.20 / 10

Evolution, measured. When the safety gate adopted an evolved prompt, the critic score rose on the runs that followed — modest, but real and directional:

writer      v1  6.89 (126 runs)  →  v2  7.12 (42 runs)    +0.23
marketing   v1  7.64 (45 runs)   →  v2  7.92 (25 runs)    +0.28

Don't take our word for it — reproduce the v1-vs-evolved comparison on your own tasks with npm run benchmark.

Feature Comparison

Feature Darwin EvoAgentX DSPy CrewAI AutoGen
Self-evolving prompts Yes Yes Yes (compiler) No No
A/B testing Yes No No No No
Safety gate + rollback Yes No No No No
TypeScript native Yes No (Python) No (Python) No (Python) No (Python)
Zero-config first agent Yes No No No Partial
MCP-native memory bridge Yes No No No No
File-based (no DB required) Yes No No No No
Built-in Critic agent Yes No No No No

Architecture

darwin/
├── src/
│   ├── core/           # Agent runner, config, MCP handling
│   ├── memory/         # SQLite storage (experiments, prompts, learnings)
│   ├── evolution/      # Darwin loop, A/B testing, safety gate, patterns
│   ├── agents/         # Built-in agents (writer, researcher, critic, analyst)
│   └── cli/            # CLI commands (run, status, evolve, create)

Memory System

Darwin uses SQLite by default — zero config, single file, no database to install.

.darwin/
├── darwin.db           # All experiments, prompts, learnings
└── reports/            # Markdown reports per run
    ├── exp-writer-2026-03-08-001.md
    └── exp-researcher-2026-03-08-002.md

Want concurrent multi-process writes and richer analytics? PostgreSQL is supported out of the box, for free — set DARWIN_POSTGRES_URL. Semantic search (pgvector), cross-agent learnings and analytics are on the roadmap, not gated behind a paywall.

CLI Reference

darwin run <agent> "task"          # Run an agent
darwin run writer "Hello" --task-type tech   # With task categorization
darwin run analyst --path ./src    # Analyze a codebase

darwin status                      # Overview of all agents
darwin status writer               # Detailed agent stats + evolution history

darwin canary writer               # Behavioural drift vs a frozen baseline (--json, --exit-on-drift)

darwin evolve writer --enable      # Enable self-evolution (persisted)
darwin evolve writer --disable     # Disable self-evolution (persisted)
darwin evolve writer --reset       # Reset to v1
darwin evolve writer --force       # Force one optimization cycle now

darwin create my-agent             # Scaffold a new agent

Advanced evolution flags

The v0.6/v0.7 evolution strategies are reachable from the CLI. darwin evolve persists them onto the agent (they survive process exit); darwin run accepts the same flags as a one-off override for a single run.

# Persist: reflect with GEPA + a stronger reflection model, pick parents by coverage
darwin evolve writer --gepa --reflection-model claude-opus-4-8 --coverage

# One-off for a single run
darwin run writer "Explain consensus" --gepa --pareto-gate
Flag What it does
--gepa / --no-gepa GEPA-style reflective prompt mutation (vs. the legacy stats optimizer)
--merge / --no-merge GEPA system-aware merge of two Pareto-front prompts as a challenger source
--pareto-gate / --no-pareto-gate Reject an A/B winner that regressed on any objective
--coverage / --no-coverage Pick the reflection parent by per-task-type coverage breadth (GEPA Algorithm 2)
--reflection-model <id> Use a stronger model for GEPA reflection (the documented leverage point)

All default to off — the baseline single-objective evolution loop is unchanged unless you opt in.

Storage: SQLite or PostgreSQL — both free, both MIT

Darwin runs on SQLite by default (zero config, single file) and on PostgreSQL out of the box — just set DARWIN_POSTGRES_URL. Both backends ship in the open-source package. There is no paywall.

Capability SQLite PostgreSQL
Experiment tracking
Prompt versioning
A/B testing + safety gate
Keyword search ✓ (FTS5) ✓ (GIN / ts_rank)
Concurrent multi-process writes

Roadmap

Not built yet — tracked in the open, PRs welcome:

  • Semantic search (pgvector embeddings)
  • Cross-agent learnings
  • Analytics & time series
  • Contradiction detection
  • Data export (CSV/JSON)

The core stays MIT. If a hosted option ever ships, the self-host path keeps every feature.

FAQ

What do I need to run Darwin? Node.js 20+ and one of: Claude CLI (default provider), ANTHROPIC_API_KEY, OPENAI_API_KEY, or a local Ollama instance. For storage, install better-sqlite3 (default) or use PostgreSQL via DARWIN_POSTGRES_URL.

Does Darwin work with models other than Claude? Yes! Darwin supports multiple providers: Claude CLI (default), Anthropic API, OpenAI/compatible APIs, and Ollama (local). Set provider in your config or use DARWIN_PROVIDER env var.

How many runs until I see improvement? Around 10 runs. First 5 establish a baseline, then Darwin generates a variant and A/B tests it over the next 5 runs.

Is my data safe? Everything stays local. SQLite file on your disk. No telemetry, no cloud, no data leaves your machine.

Can I use this for non-English tasks? Yes. Agents detect language automatically. Darwin's evaluation is language-agnostic.

What if Darwin makes my agent worse? The safety gate prevents regressions. If a new variant scores >20% lower, Darwin automatically rolls back to the last known-good version.

Known Limitations

  • LLM-as-Judge bias: Critics use LLMs to evaluate LLM outputs. Each agent is scored by a multi-dimension critic set (several scoring rubrics per agent type, not a single number). When more than one provider key is present, the CLI also spreads those critics across model families — e.g. GPT for one, Claude for another — to blunt single-model self-preference; with one provider they all run on it. Inherent judge bias still exists. Research context.
  • Statistical simplicity (default): A/B tests use mean comparison with a 5% threshold by default, not formal significance tests. computeDynamicMinRuns() adjusts sample sizes based on variance. For rigor, v0.6 added an opt-in requireConfidence effect-size gate and v0.7 ships proper always-valid sequential tests — set confidenceMethod: 'msprt' (Mixture SPRT) or 'hoeffding' (σ-free confidence sequence) on your SafetyThresholds to make the peeking-resistant gate statistically sound. The default path remains the simple threshold for zero-config use.
  • No human-in-the-loop approval: Prompt mutations go directly to A/B testing. Telegram notifications inform you, but there's no approval gate before testing starts.

Contributing

PRs welcome. See CONTRIBUTING.md.

About StudioMeyer

StudioMeyer is an AI and design studio based in Palma de Mallorca, working with clients worldwide. We build custom websites and AI infrastructure for small and medium businesses. Production stack on Claude Agent SDK, MCP and n8n, with Sentry, Langfuse and LangGraph for observability and an in-house guard layer.

License

MIT — use freely, commercially or personally.


Your agents don't just run. They evolve.

Built by StudioMeyer

AI Shield · Agent Fleet · MCP Video