docs(mission): iteration 205 record — the -coverpkg answer is NO - #725
Merged
Conversation
… it would have hidden the defect that raised the question Charter STATUS rotated (205 in, 202 archived; arithmetic asserted before the write, and the archive asserted to have GAINED what the charter lost), queue row updated, dashboard overwritten, log entry 206 appended. The pick was the queue head, and the iteration's finding is that turning `-coverpkg` on would have painted iteration 204's actual defect green — a function with no own-package test — so Sonar's 0.0% was a true positive that forced the right fix. Two of the queue row's own premises are refuted by first-party A/B (105 packages, 3 replicates per arm): runtime 89/78/82s -> 92/79/83s (~+1-4%, not "material"), and total 45.5% -> 48.1%, i.e. UP, both arms far above the 29% gate. The real cost was one the row never named: the merged profile goes 5.7 MB -> 599 MB (~105x), and the Sonar step is continue-on-error, so an ingest failure would be silent. Quorum blocked twice with both reviewers present in each round; round 2 closed under the narrow-refinement carve-out with both objections measured rather than forwarded, and both confirmed. Gate 3b green: PR #724 -> c095f1f, 21 checks, 4/4 required. Gate 5: no skill edit — three candidate gaps, each at instance 1 against the >=2 bar, recorded as watch-items. One is FLAGGED as a live rule tension: the Fable one-run-per-iteration discipline has no stated exception for the revision pass Gate 2's own one-revision flow requires. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Charter STATUS rotated (205 in, 202 archived — arithmetic asserted before the write, and the
archive asserted to have gained what the charter lost), queue row updated, dashboard
overwritten (40 lines, contract met), log entry 206 appended.
The finding: turning
-coverpkgon would have painted iteration 204's actual defect green —a function with no own-package test — so Sonar's 0.0% was a true positive that forced the right
fix. The doc refuses the change.
Two of the queue row's own premises refuted by first-party A/B (105 packages, 3 replicates per
arm): runtime 89/78/82s → 92/79/83s (~+1–4%, not "material");
total:45.5% → 48.1%, i.e. up,both arms far above the 29% gate. The real cost was one the row never named: the merged profile
goes 5.7 MB → 599 MB (~105×), and the Sonar step is
continue-on-error: true, so an ingest failurewould be silent.
Design doc landed separately in #724 →
c095f1f0e.🤖 Generated with Claude Code