docs(mission): record iteration 216 — weekly sweep found 15 orphans, #696 landed - #744
Open
sunholo-voight-kampff wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
docs(mission): record iteration 216 — weekly sweep found 15 orphans, #696 landed#744sunholo-voight-kampff wants to merge 1 commit into
sunholo-voight-kampff wants to merge 1 commit into
Conversation
…696 landed Gate 4 record + one Gate-5 skill edit. RECORD - Charter STATUS stamp for ITERATION 216, rotated 213 to the archive. Assertions run before writing: charter line-count invariant (after == before + 2 - 2*moved) held; archive gained the moved stamp (iteration 190's archive-END assertion) with a firing known-present control; charter no longer carries a 213 STATUS header; queue-row canary and `## Queue` heading both intact; `^## STATUS 2026` == 3. - New queue row `m-sweep-orphans-2026-08-17` batching the 14 remaining zero-mention issues, lane-sequenced, with per-issue triage-lite explicitly recorded as OWED. - Log entry `## 217`. GATE-5 SKILL EDIT (one, ≥2 frictions, mission-independent) The Gate-4 dashboard path was an unnamespaced literal `design_docs/mission-dashboard.md` that EVERY mission overwrites, while the gate's own emphasis is "OVERWRITE never append". Measured: that file held Motoko's snapshot while a separate hand-created `motoko-mission-dashboard.md` also existed — a sibling controller had already worked around it by hand, exactly as siblings did for the designer-rotation state key, and the shared skill never read the namespaced path. V1 iterations 212/213/214/215 each recorded the friction and each responded by OMITTING V1's dashboard refresh, so V1 had no current dashboard for four consecutive iterations — precisely the 30-second context the gate exists to guarantee. Namespaced to `design_docs/<mission>-mission-dashboard.md`; V1's snapshot now lives at `design_docs/v1-mission-dashboard.md` and Motoko's is untouched. The note also points at the un-done audit the rotation-key fix promised: when this skill names a path a mission writes, ask what the sibling writes there first. CAVEAT, ESCALATED IN THE REPORT AND THE DASHBOARD: this skill edit reaches origin but NOT the running copy, which resolves through the main checkout's working tree. That checkout is 1 ahead / 15 behind origin/dev, so the ratified D-16 fast-forward authorization does not apply (any ahead-state triggers Critical Principle 0) and the reconcile is a human decision. Gates: make check-changelog rc=0 · make test-launchd-drivers rc=0 (35/17/10 passed, 0 failed; its decision-ledger arm reads this charter) · mission_decisions.sh --check valid, 19 rows, 10 OPEN. darwin/arm64; ubuntu leg unrun locally. Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Gate-4 record for V1 mission iteration 216, plus one Gate-5 skill edit.
Record
ITERATION 216;213rotated to the archive. Assertions run before writing: charter line-count invariant (after == before + 2 - 2*moved) held; the archive gained the moved stamp (iteration 190's archive-END assertion) with a firing known-present control; the charter no longer carries a213STATUS header; queue-row canary and## Queueheading both intact;^## STATUS 2026== 3. Charter diff is+36/-2and shows exactly+216 stamp / -213 stamp.m-sweep-orphans-2026-08-17batching the 14 remaining zero-mention issues, lane-sequenced (mission-infra → language → consumer reports), with per-issue triage-lite recorded as OWED, not done.## 217.Iteration outcome (already landed,
#741→3a75ec7d2, dev CI green)The weekly external-issue sweep — mandatory on the first iteration past the Monday-07:00 boundary — found 15 orphans of 75 enumerated, breaking a four-iteration park streak (212–215) without needing any of the 10 OPEN ledger decisions.
#696was picked from it, ghost-disciplined (REAL when filed, FIXED at HEAD byde0e41099), and closed behind a new CI guard.Gate-5 skill edit (one; ≥2 frictions; mission-independent)
The Gate-4 dashboard path was an unnamespaced literal
design_docs/mission-dashboard.mdthat every mission overwrites — while the gate's own emphasis is "OVERWRITE never append". Measured: that file held Motoko's snapshot while a separate, hand-createdmotoko-mission-dashboard.mdalso existed. A careful sibling controller had already worked around this by hand, exactly as siblings did for the designer-rotation state key, and the shared skill never read the namespaced path.The failure is silent in both directions: obey the rule and you destroy a sibling's dashboard while reporting success; notice the collision and you can only skip your own record. V1 iterations 212 ("the cross-mission single-dashboard collision is a new process-gap instance"), 213, 214 and 215 each recorded the friction and each omitted V1's dashboard refresh — so V1 had no current dashboard for four consecutive iterations, precisely the 30-second context the gate exists to guarantee.
Namespaced to
design_docs/<mission>-mission-dashboard.md. V1's snapshot now lives atdesign_docs/v1-mission-dashboard.md; Motoko's is untouched. The note also points at the audit the rotation-key fix promised and never did: when this skill names a path a mission writes to, ask what the sibling writes there first.⚠ Caveat — the skill edit is not live
It reaches
originbut not the running copy, which resolves through the main checkout's working tree (~/.claude/skills/mission-control→ that checkout). The main checkout is 1 ahead / 15 behindorigin/dev, so the ratifiedD-16fast-forward authorization does not apply — any ahead-state triggers Critical Principle 0 — and the reconcile is a human decision. Escalated in the report and recorded in the new dashboard.Gates
make check-changelog→ rc=0make test-launchd-drivers→ rc=0 (35 / 17 / 10 passed, 0 failed; its decision-ledger arm reads this charter)scripts/mission_decisions.sh --check→ valid, 19 rows, 10 OPEN (unchanged)Platform: darwin/arm64; the ubuntu leg is unrun locally.
🤖 Generated with Claude Code