Skip to content

Conversation

@luccas-harbour
Copy link
Contributor

  • Implements a function that will patch a document's numbering definition to make sure it's valid

@linear
Copy link

linear bot commented Jan 27, 2026

@luccas-harbour luccas-harbour marked this pull request as ready for review January 27, 2026 15:30
Copy link
Contributor

@caio-pizzol caio-pizzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! Just one small comment

@caio-pizzol caio-pizzol self-requested a review January 27, 2026 21:44
Copy link
Contributor

@caio-pizzol caio-pizzol left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@caio-pizzol caio-pizzol enabled auto-merge (squash) January 27, 2026 21:44
Copy link
Collaborator

@harbournick harbournick left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@harbournick harbournick disabled auto-merge January 28, 2026 08:05
@harbournick harbournick merged commit f34b121 into main Jan 28, 2026
3 of 5 checks passed
@harbournick harbournick deleted the luccas/sd-1647-patch-documents-with-bad-numbering-definition branch January 28, 2026 08:06
harbournick pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 28, 2026
# [1.9.0-next.9](v1.9.0-next.8...v1.9.0-next.9) (2026-01-28)

### Bug Fixes

* patch broken numbering definitions ([#1848](#1848)) ([f34b121](f34b121))
@harbournick
Copy link
Collaborator

🎉 This PR is included in version 1.9.0-next.9 🎉

The release is available on:

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants