-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 137
refactor: migrate units/index parent state to Angular #435
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: 9.x
Are you sure you want to change the base?
refactor: migrate units/index parent state to Angular #435
Conversation
Replace AngularJS units/index with Angular implementation by adapting UnitRootState. This provides unit and unitRole data to child states while maintaining compatibility with existing AngularJS children. Changes: - Rename unit-root-state to units/index - Update URL from /units2/:unitId to /units/:unitId - Split unit and unitRole into separate resolvers - Add loading state to template - Use default ui-view instead of named unitView - Remove old AngularJS files (index.coffee, index.tpl.html) - Update module dependencies in states.coffee - Fix TaskViewerState parent reference Part of inbox migration (PR 1 of 3)
Remove import reference to build/src/app/units/states/index/index.js which no longer exists after migration to Angular. This was causing the dev server to fail during build.
|
My colleague reviewed and pointed out an issue. this has been fixed! I removed the stale import from The import was referencing Thanks for catching this! Ready for review ^^ |
|
Hi @31Husain31, I was checking your changes locally but I encountered few issues. Please do check if you are also facing similar or is it just happening in my device. When I click on a unit from homepage (as a student), I am redirected to project2 url. And I see this: And when I go to a project from the dropdown menu, I see this: This PR breaks child states that still use AngularJS. The problem is scope inheritance. The old parent state had a controller that set Your new component uses async pipes That's why the pages show blank - all the child controllers are failing silently because they can't find the unit data. The hybrid app still needs the old scope-based pattern to work while CoffeeScript states exist as children. Could you investigate this issue? |
…mpatibility - Subscribe to unit$ and unitRole$ observables in ngOnInit - Store values as component properties for Angular template - Set values on for AngularJS child states to access - Use () to trigger AngularJS digest cycle - Add defensive checks for Angular availability - Clean up subscriptions in ngOnDestroy Fixes scope inheritance issue where AngularJS child states (units/tasks, units/edit, etc.) couldn't access unit data from the Angular parent component.
|
Thanks for the detailed review and catching this scope inheritance issue! @mannat2634 I've pushed a fix that:
The hybrid approach now works: Angular parent provides data that AngularJS children can access via $rootScope.unit and $rootScope.unitRole. Could you test again and let me know if this resolves the page issue? |
|
Hi @31Husain31, I tested this PR locally and ran into an issue — could you please check if you’re seeing the same on your end? Issue Clicking a unit from the homepage (student view) redirects to the project2 URL and shows a blank page. Opening a project via the dropdown results in the same blank screen. Same issue was also reported by another reviewer, so this doesn’t seem environment-specific. Likely Cause (Hybrid Angular / AngularJS) This PR breaks AngularJS child states due to scope inheritance. Previously, the parent AngularJS controller populated: $scope.unit $scope.unitRole Child states (units/tasks, units/edit, units/students-list, etc.) still rely on these values. The new Angular parent uses observables + async pipes (unit$ | async), which don’t populate the AngularJS $scope. As a result, child controllers receive undefined and fail silently, causing the blank pages. Suggestion Until all child states are migrated: Bridge unit / unitRole back onto $scope, or Delay converting this parent state until AngularJS children are removed Let me know — happy to help test a fix. |
|
Hi Husain, I pulled the branch and tried to run it locally, but I’m hitting a couple of blockers that prevent me from reviewing the functionality.
build/src/app/units/states/index/index.js This reference doesn’t appear anywhere in the repo, so it looks like something in the build pipeline (or a cached output) is still expecting it. Because of this, the Angular dev server won’t start, so I can’t load the webapp. Could you remove or update the stale reference so the frontend can compile?
The backend is seeded correctly (verified via It looks like the Angular side isn’t hitting the API or isn’t receiving the session properly. This might be related to proxy config, auth setup, or a missing migration step. Could you confirm whether any additional setup is required for the Angular login flow? |
|
Hey @31Husain31, I pulled this branch and tested the changes locally on my system. The migration of the units/index parent state to Angular works as expected, and the routing update to /units/:unitId loads correctly in my testing. I verified basic student navigation, including opening a unit from the homepage and accessing unit-related pages, and I didn’t encounter any blank screens or routing issues during these flows. The approach of keeping the child states in AngularJS while the parent is handled in Angular seems to function correctly in this setup. |


Description
Parent Migration (PR 1 of 3): First PR in the 3-part inbox migration. Migrates the units/index parent state from AngularJS to Angular by adapting the existing UnitRootState. This parent provides unit and unitRole data to all child states (tasks, edit, students, etc.) while maintaining compatibility with existing AngularJS children.
What Changed:
Part of: T3 2025 - Investigate partial migration for tasks/inbox
Related PRs: PR 2/3 (units/tasks) and PR 3/3 (inbox) to follow
Migration Plan: INBOX_FULL_MIGRATION_PLAN.md
Type of change
How Has This Been Tested?
Manual testing required for:
Testing Checklist:
[ ] Tested in latest Chrome
[ ] Tested in latest Safari
[ ] Tested in latest Firefox
Checklist:
[x] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
[x] I have performed a self-review of my own code
[ ] I have commented my code in hard-to-understand areas (code is straightforward refactor)
[ ] I have made corresponding changes to the documentation (none required for internal refactor)
[x] My changes generate no new warnings
[x] I have requested a review from my team