Fix non-functional error-check in cpucycles() - #3
Open
Gnoxter wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
read() returns a ssize_t while sizeof() is a size_t. Thus the ssize_t is promoted to an unsigned integer. This leads to misinterpreting a -1 returned by read() on an error condition as successful read(). This commit fixes this by casting the sizeof() to an ssize_t. Alternatively a == -1 check should be sufficient as one would expect perf to make the requested data available in proper size or fail accordingly. Signed-off-by: Gnoxter <gnoxter@linuxlounge.net>
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
read() returns a ssize_t while sizeof() is a
size_t. Thus the ssize_t is promoted to an
unsigned integer. This leads to
misinterpreting a -1 returned by read()
on an error condition as successful read().
This commit fixes this by casting the sizeof()
to an ssize_t. Alternatively a == -1 check should
be sufficient as one would expect perf
to make the requested data available in proper size
or fail accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Gnoxter gnoxter@linuxlounge.net