Skip to content

DX-596-together-gpu-clusters: sync with mintlify-docs#1165#41

Merged
neerajshah-ux merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs-sync/together-gpu-clusters/mintlify-docs-pr-1165
Jul 9, 2026
Merged

DX-596-together-gpu-clusters: sync with mintlify-docs#1165#41
neerajshah-ux merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
docs-sync/together-gpu-clusters/mintlify-docs-pr-1165

Conversation

@zainhas

@zainhas zainhas commented Jul 9, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Syncs with togethercomputer/mintlify-docs#1165 ("DX-785: docs: add storage performance test documentation").

Changed docs that triggered this sync:

  • docs/health-checks.mdx

Skill changes:

  • Add Storage Performance to the automatic acceptance testing list in references/cluster-management.md so the reference reflects that new clusters are validated for storage throughput/integrity alongside GPU and NCCL checks.
  • Add a new Storage subsection under Available Health Check Tests describing the fio-based sequential read/write + checksummed write/read-back test.
  • Document the new Skipped result state and the Shared volume PVC not created message that Kubernetes clusters get until a shared-volume PVC exists, and point at the existing Storage section for the fix.

Skipped intentionally:

  • Pass/fail threshold table values (10 GiB/s read, 5 GiB/s write): the reference doesn't carry the docs' threshold table for other tests either, so keeping it out preserves scope.
  • The docs' "Slow data loading -> run Storage Performance + NVBandwidth" tip: the skill reference doesn't have a symptom-to-test triage table.

Generated by the Sync Skills Cursor Automation. Please review before merging.

Sync with togethercomputer/mintlify-docs#1165 which adds the Storage
Performance active health check and includes it in automatic acceptance
testing.
@zainhas zainhas self-assigned this Jul 9, 2026
@zainhas zainhas requested a review from neerajshah-ux July 9, 2026 18:55
@neerajshah-ux neerajshah-ux merged commit 7f58698 into main Jul 9, 2026
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants